From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Kaiwen Shi <skwkevin@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] mac802154: fix data race and NULL deref on local->assoc_dev
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 11:11:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878q5sdj1y.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826225959.682483-1-skwkevin@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (Kaiwen Shi's message of "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 06:59:59 +0800")
Hi Kaiwen,
> - cache the coordinator extended address instead of retaining the
> assoc_dev pointer, as suggested by Miquel;
> - use a plain spinlock to serialize the cached address and associating
> bit, including 64-bit address accesses on 32-bit architectures;
Can you justify the choice of a spinlock vs. mutex here? This is an open
question, not a request for changes.
> - reset the completion under the same lock, recheck the associating bit
> in the response handler, and complete before releasing the lock;
> - use the response payload in the debug message;
> - add Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org.
>
...
> --- a/net/mac802154/scan.c
> +++ b/net/mac802154/scan.c
> @@ -578,9 +578,11 @@ int mac802154_perform_association(struct ieee802154_sub_if_data *sdata,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - local->assoc_dev = coord;
> + spin_lock(&local->assoc_lock);
> reinit_completion(&local->assoc_done);
> + local->assoc_dev_extended_addr = coord->extended_addr;
> set_bit(IEEE802154_IS_ASSOCIATING, &local->ongoing);
> + spin_unlock(&local->assoc_lock);
>
> ret = ieee802154_mlme_tx_one_locked(local, sdata, skb);
> if (ret) {
Shouldn't we also make sure that accessing assoc_status/assoc_addr is
serialized? Typically, I believe the IS_ASSOCIATING bit should be
cleared earlier in mac802154_perform_association(), just after the
wait_for_completion call returns. This way, in case we get two responses
for the same request (maybe a malicious one), it will prevent the
possibility to get incoherent assoc_status and assoc_address.
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 22:59 [PATCH net v2] mac802154: fix data race and NULL deref on local->assoc_dev Kaiwen Shi
2026-08-27 9:11 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2026-08-27 22:11 ` Kaiwen Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878q5sdj1y.fsf@bootlin.com \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=skwkevin@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox