Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Ibrahim Hashimov <security@auditcode.ai>
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
	 Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
	 "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,  Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org,  netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mac802154: hold an interface reference across the scan worker
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:57:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878q7akn85.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710140927.13228-1-security@auditcode.ai> (Ibrahim Hashimov's message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:09:27 +0200")

Hi Ibrahim,

> +	/* From here on sdata->dev is dereferenced after rcu_read_unlock() and
> +	 * outside the rtnl: in the dev_err()/dev_dbg() traces below, in
> +	 * mac802154_transmit_beacon_req() (skb->dev = sdata->dev) and in the
> +	 * end_scan mac802154_scan_cleanup_locked() call. A concurrent teardown
> +	 * of that interface (NL802154_CMD_DEL_INTERFACE ->
> +	 * ieee802154_if_remove(), or a full PHY removal via
> +	 * ieee802154_unregister_hw()) can unregister the netdev; the actual
> +	 * free then runs asynchronously from netdev_run_todo() with the rtnl
> +	 * already dropped, so neither holding the rtnl nor the per-PHY
> +	 * IEEE802154_IS_SCANNING flag keeps sdata->dev alive here. Pin it with
> +	 * a reference taken while we still hold the RCU read lock (so the
> +	 * netdev cannot be freed before we bump the refcount) and drop it at
> +	 * every exit below. This blocks the teardown's netdev_run_todo() until
> +	 * this worker iteration is done; it cannot self-deadlock because the
> +	 * unregistering task claims the net_todo_list entry under the rtnl, so
> +	 * the blocking netdev_wait_allrefs_any() always runs on that task, not
> +	 * on this single-threaded worker.
> +	 */

The patch seems correct, the fix as well, but can we trim down this huge
comment please?

Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-10 14:09 [PATCH net] mac802154: hold an interface reference across the scan worker Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-17  8:57 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2026-07-17 10:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-17 11:37   ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878q7akn85.fsf@bootlin.com \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=security@auditcode.ai \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox