Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Zijing Yin <yzjaurora@gmail.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	 Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dev_addr_lists: don't WARN on GFP_ATOMIC kmalloc failure in netif_rx_mode_run
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 13:22:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878q9fod8m.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519095557.3749407-1-yzjaurora@gmail.com> (Zijing Yin's message of "Tue, 19 May 2026 02:55:55 -0700")

On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 02:55 AM -07, Zijing Yin wrote:
> netif_rx_mode_run() fires netdev_WARN() when netif_addr_lists_snapshot()
> returns non-zero. The only path to a non-zero return is -ENOMEM from
> __hw_addr_create() failing its kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) -- syzkaller hits it
> via failslab, and it can also be reached under real memory pressure.
>
> This is the only allocator-failure site in this file that WARNs.
> __hw_addr_create() itself, and every other caller of it in this file
> (__hw_addr_add_ex(), dev_uc_add_excl(), dev_uc_add(), dev_mc_add(), ...)
> just propagate the -ENOMEM silently. GFP_ATOMIC is a may-fail allocator;
> callers are required to handle NULL, so a returned -ENOMEM here is an
> expected runtime condition, not an invariant violation.
>
> The miss is self-healing: any subsequent change to dev->uc / dev->mc
> (every dev_{uc,mc}_{add,del}, IFF_PROMISC flip, etc.) calls
> __dev_set_rx_mode() -> netif_rx_mode_queue(), which re-queues the device
> and retries the sync. The only cost of a failed attempt is one stale
> rx-mode window until the next update; nothing in the kernel relies on
> this attempt succeeding.
>
> Demote to net_err_ratelimited() so the condition stays observable in
> dmesg without tripping panic_on_warn.
>
> Reproducer (syzkaller .prog format with setup notes): 
> https://pastebin.com/t7AQKx9v
>
> Fixes: 3554b4345d85 ("net: introduce ndo_set_rx_mode_async and netdev_rx_mode_work")
> Signed-off-by: Zijing Yin <yzjaurora@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/core/dev_addr_lists.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
> index d73fcb0c6..c6fdcac74 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
> @@ -1275,7 +1275,8 @@ static void netif_rx_mode_run(struct net_device *dev)
>  		err = netif_addr_lists_snapshot(dev, &uc_snap, &mc_snap,
>  						&uc_ref, &mc_ref);
>  		if (err) {
> -			netdev_WARN(dev, "failed to sync uc/mc addresses\n");
> +			net_err_ratelimited("%s: failed to sync uc/mc addresses\n",
> +					    netdev_name(dev));
>  			netif_addr_unlock_bh(dev);
>  			return;
>  		}

1) I'd go with net_warn_ratelimited() instead. The promoted message
level in syslog might cause operational pain, and as you say the
condition is self-healing. Seems unwarranted.

2) Since it has a Fixes tag, should probably be sumitted for 'net' tree.

3) Was this reported by syzbot? If so, there should also be Reported-by
and Closes tags.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-19 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-19  9:55 [PATCH net-next] net: dev_addr_lists: don't WARN on GFP_ATOMIC kmalloc failure in netif_rx_mode_run Zijing Yin
2026-05-19 11:22 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2026-05-19 12:11   ` Zijing yin
2026-05-19 12:22     ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-19 12:26       ` Zijing yin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878q9fod8m.fsf@cloudflare.com \
    --to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=yzjaurora@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox