From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien BLACHE Subject: Re: [regression] fib6_del() bug from 2.6.34-rc1 still present in 2.6.34 Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:54:20 +0200 Message-ID: <878w7962wj.fsf@sonic.technologeek.org> References: <87632g53tx.fsf@sonic.technologeek.org> <4BF9DCB7.8040308@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Shan Wei Return-path: Received: from ix.technologeek.org ([213.41.157.215]:35104 "EHLO sonic.technologeek.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752364Ab0EXJy1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2010 05:54:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BF9DCB7.8040308@cn.fujitsu.com> (Shan Wei's message of "Mon, 24 May 2010 09:56:07 +0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Shan Wei wrote: Hi, > I saw the warning on 2.6.34-rc3. But on net-next tree the warning disappeared. > So I think the bug is fixed in net-next tree. My NIC driver is r8169. > > The net-next tree is newer than 2.6.34, maybe the fix is not queued to 2.6.34. > So the warning also be present in 2.6.34. > Can you try net-next tree firstly? Unfortunately, this tree has a number of issues that prevent a successful boot into userland on my machine :/ Any idea what the fix(es) is so I can test it out? JB. -- Julien BLACHE GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169