From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jesper@krogh.cc, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, aowi@novozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:27:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8799.1236986836@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090313.161217.52045656.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
>Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100
>
>> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> > However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii
>> > refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the
>> > problem. That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes.
>> > Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19
>> > and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)?
>>
>> There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the forcedeth patch).
>
>Jay please resend this with proper signoffs etc. if you want
>me to apply it.
I posted it again with the usual stuff a day or two after I
posted the test patch; I'll append it to the end of this email. Note
that the below patch has a minor cosmetic change from the test patch.
I believe this fix should go to -stable for 2.6.26 and 2.6.27,
but it'll need the change Jesper added to pick up a macro that was added
to mainline:
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index fb730ec..b1315e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -248,6 +248,14 @@ static inline struct bonding
*bond_get_bond_by_slave(struct slave *slave)
return (struct bonding *)slave->dev->master->priv;
}
+static inline bool bond_is_lb(const struct bonding *bond)
+{
+ return bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_TLB
+ || bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ALB;
+}
+
+
+
#define BOND_FOM_NONE 0
#define BOND_FOM_ACTIVE 1
#define BOND_FOM_FOLLOW 2
The above fragment isn't needed for mainline, only for -stable.
-J
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, stable@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] bonding: Fix updating of speed/duplex changes
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:27:33 -0800
This patch corrects an omission from the following commit:
commit f0c76d61779b153dbfb955db3f144c62d02173c2
Author: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Jul 2 18:21:58 2008 -0700
bonding: refactor mii monitor
The un-refactored code checked the link speed and duplex of
every slave on every pass; the refactored code did not do so.
The 802.3ad and balance-alb/tlb modes utilize the speed and
duplex information, and require it to be kept up to date. This patch
adds a notifier check to perform the appropriate updating when the slave
device speed changes.
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index bfe1ed8..dce3cf9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3545,11 +3545,26 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long event, struct net_device *slave
}
break;
case NETDEV_CHANGE:
- /*
- * TODO: is this what we get if somebody
- * sets up a hierarchical bond, then rmmod's
- * one of the slave bonding devices?
- */
+ if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD || bond_is_lb(bond)) {
+ struct slave *slave;
+
+ slave = bond_get_slave_by_dev(bond, slave_dev);
+ if (slave) {
+ u16 old_speed = slave->speed;
+ u16 old_duplex = slave->duplex;
+
+ bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
+
+ if (bond_is_lb(bond))
+ break;
+
+ if (old_speed != slave->speed)
+ bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(slave);
+ if (old_duplex != slave->duplex)
+ bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed(slave);
+ }
+ }
+
break;
case NETDEV_DOWN:
/*
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-13 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-16 9:41 Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 Jesper Krogh
2008-11-17 23:45 ` Jay Vosburgh
2008-11-18 20:24 ` Jesper Krogh
2008-11-18 20:28 ` Jesper Krogh
2008-11-18 20:53 ` Jay Vosburgh
2008-11-19 7:53 ` Jesper Krogh
2008-12-08 20:42 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-11-19 10:01 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 9:25 ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 16:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-27 20:07 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 20:35 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-28 17:21 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 6:21 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 13:19 ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice Jesper Krogh
2009-03-05 18:51 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-09 20:53 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-13 23:12 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 23:27 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2009-03-16 20:34 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 20:35 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 20:18 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-19 1:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8799.1236986836@death.nxdomain.ibm.com \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aowi@novozymes.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jesper@krogh.cc \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).