* [PATCH v2 net-next] ipv6: annotate data-races around devconf->rpl_seg_enabled
@ 2025-08-27 8:12 Yue Haibing
2025-08-30 2:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yue Haibing @ 2025-08-27 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, dsahern, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, kuniyu, alex.aring
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, yuehaibing
devconf->rpl_seg_enabled can be changed concurrently from
/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf, annotate lockless reads on it.
Also initializes extra1 and extra2 to SYSCTL_ZERO and SYSCTL_ONE
respectively to avoid negative value writes, which may lead to
unexpected results in ipv6_rpl_srh_rcv().
Fixes: 8610c7c6e3bd ("net: ipv6: add support for rpl sr exthdr")
Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
v2: add extra1/2 check
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 4 +++-
net/ipv6/exthdrs.c | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 1c1d5cb6a7c1..265238574aab 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -7240,7 +7240,9 @@ static const struct ctl_table addrconf_sysctl[] = {
.data = &ipv6_devconf.rpl_seg_enabled,
.maxlen = sizeof(int),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
+ .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
},
{
.procname = "ioam6_enabled",
diff --git a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
index d1ef9644f826..a23eb8734e15 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
@@ -494,10 +494,8 @@ static int ipv6_rpl_srh_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
idev = __in6_dev_get(skb->dev);
- accept_rpl_seg = net->ipv6.devconf_all->rpl_seg_enabled;
- if (accept_rpl_seg > idev->cnf.rpl_seg_enabled)
- accept_rpl_seg = idev->cnf.rpl_seg_enabled;
-
+ accept_rpl_seg = min(READ_ONCE(net->ipv6.devconf_all->rpl_seg_enabled),
+ READ_ONCE(idev->cnf.rpl_seg_enabled));
if (!accept_rpl_seg) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return -1;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ipv6: annotate data-races around devconf->rpl_seg_enabled
2025-08-27 8:12 [PATCH v2 net-next] ipv6: annotate data-races around devconf->rpl_seg_enabled Yue Haibing
@ 2025-08-30 2:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-01 7:15 ` Yue Haibing
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-08-30 2:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yue Haibing
Cc: davem, dsahern, edumazet, pabeni, horms, kuniyu, alex.aring,
netdev, linux-kernel
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 16:12:43 +0800 Yue Haibing wrote:
> Also initializes extra1 and extra2 to SYSCTL_ZERO and SYSCTL_ONE
> respectively to avoid negative value writes, which may lead to
> unexpected results in ipv6_rpl_srh_rcv().
By unexpected results you mean that min() is intended to return 0
when either value is zero, but if one of the values is negative it
will in fact return non-zero?
That's a fair point, but I'm not sure whether we should be sending
that up as a fix. It's more of a sanity check that prevents
unintentional misconfiguration.. Please split this patch into two
separate ones, and send the minmax one without a Fixes tag.
Please include more of the explanation I have provided in the first
paragraph in the commit message, "unexpected results" is too vague
by itself.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ipv6: annotate data-races around devconf->rpl_seg_enabled
2025-08-30 2:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2025-09-01 7:15 ` Yue Haibing
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yue Haibing @ 2025-09-01 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: davem, dsahern, edumazet, pabeni, horms, kuniyu, alex.aring,
netdev, linux-kernel
On 2025/8/30 10:27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 16:12:43 +0800 Yue Haibing wrote:
>> Also initializes extra1 and extra2 to SYSCTL_ZERO and SYSCTL_ONE
>> respectively to avoid negative value writes, which may lead to
>> unexpected results in ipv6_rpl_srh_rcv().
>
> By unexpected results you mean that min() is intended to return 0
> when either value is zero, but if one of the values is negative it
> will in fact return non-zero?
Yes,this is exact.
>
> That's a fair point, but I'm not sure whether we should be sending
> that up as a fix. It's more of a sanity check that prevents
> unintentional misconfiguration.. Please split this patch into two
> separate ones, and send the minmax one without a Fixes tag.
> Please include more of the explanation I have provided in the first
> paragraph in the commit message, "unexpected results" is too vague
> by itself.
Ok, thanks, will split and resend with this.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-01 7:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-27 8:12 [PATCH v2 net-next] ipv6: annotate data-races around devconf->rpl_seg_enabled Yue Haibing
2025-08-30 2:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-01 7:15 ` Yue Haibing
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).