From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
hawk@kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org,
almasrymina@google.com
Cc: shenjian15@huawei.com, liuyonglong@huawei.com,
chenhao418@huawei.com, yangshuaisong@h-partners.com,
ningwei15@huawei.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shaojijie@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net] net: page_pool: fix UAF in __page_pool_release_netmem_dma on xa_cmpxchg race
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:58:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a4qra9lr.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807114830.344336-1-shaojijie@huawei.com>
Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com> writes:
> This bug was discovered while testing the hns3 driver under channel
> reconfiguration (`ethtool -L` / `ethtool -G`) with iperf3 traffic on
> arm64. The race is intermittently triggered when page_pool_destroy()
> runs page_pool_scrub() concurrently with page return via
> page_pool_put_netmem() on a different CPU. A WARN in
> page_pool_clear_pp_info() surfaced the dangling DMA index bits left
> by the cmpxchg loser, which led to the investigation.
>
> page_pool_scrub() iterates pool->dma_mapped via xa_for_each() with no
> page ref held. __page_pool_release_netmem_dma() currently reads and
> writes netmem fields (dma_addr, DMA index bits in pp_magic) after
> xa_cmpxchg() returns. The unref path calls put_page() unconditionally
> regardless of the cmpxchg outcome; when it loses the cmpxchg, it still
> frees the page before the scrub winner finishes these netmem accesses,
> so scrub touches a freed page -- a Use-After-Free.
>
> Fix this by splitting the DMA release into two functions:
>
> 1. __page_pool_unmap_netmem_dma() caches dma_addr before xa_cmpxchg(),
> does the cmpxchg to remove the DMA mapping, and calls dma_unmap on
> the cached address. It never touches netmem fields after the cmpxchg,
> making it safe for the scrub path which holds no page ref.
>
> 2. __page_pool_release_netmem_dma() wraps the above and additionally
> clears dma_addr and DMA index bits in netmem fields. This is safe
> only when the caller holds a page ref, so it is used by the return
> path (page_pool_return_netmem).
>
> The scrub path calls __page_pool_unmap_netmem_dma() directly; the return
> path calls __page_pool_release_netmem_dma().
>
> Fixes: ee62ce7a1d90 ("page_pool: Track DMA-mapped pages and unmap them when destroying the pool")
> Suggested-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
> Assisted-by: OhMyOpenCode:GLM-5.2
> Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Replace goto label with if block per Jakub's review.
> - Add bug discovery context to commit message per Jakub's request.
> - Add Reviewed-by tag from Mina.
> - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260731111507.2355601-1-shaojijie@huawei.com
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Restructure per Mina's review: merge page_pool_remove_dma_mapping()
> into __page_pool_unmap_netmem_dma() with dma_unmap inlined via goto
> label; simplify __page_pool_release_netmem_dma() to a thin wrapper.
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260729110249.2824835-1-shaojijie@huawei.com
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix unlikely() to likely() for PP_DMA_INDEX_BITS to match
> file convention.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260727132612.3277927-1-shaojijie@huawei.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Redesign the fix per Mina's review: v1's unconditional
> netmem_set_dma_index() introduced a UAF when the scrub path
> (no page ref) writes to a page freed by the unref path.
> - Cache dma_addr before xa_cmpxchg; move dma_addr/DMA index
> cleanup to page_pool_return_netmem() which holds a page ref.
> - Rename page_pool_release_dma_index() to
> page_pool_remove_dma_mapping() to reflect its new role as a
> pure cmpxchg wrapper.
> - Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260724092135.414699-1-shaojijie@huawei.com
A bit late to the game (just got back from vacation), but LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 11:48 [PATCH v5 net] net: page_pool: fix UAF in __page_pool_release_netmem_dma on xa_cmpxchg race Jijie Shao
2026-08-12 1:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 10:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a4qra9lr.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=chenhao418@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ningwei15@huawei.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shaojijie@huawei.com \
--cc=shenjian15@huawei.com \
--cc=yangshuaisong@h-partners.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox