From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25B814830F; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 15:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738166297; cv=none; b=PePGb/qbGGTsxcivvMVEghe2KV5QLf5PVJAlbNa3v8uUzXeYkZyJVxIvga5oriLRsD24XeCF5z014OeKR67Ef/PKI6zx/DbjPzbnRGRi1c8xwzLH8wkRDo+T3Cgg74hNuEfrZGjbdgz7FL51dgJNDlX9w8i4tp4Eo7R6sESnC8U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738166297; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eCxsbEQuSkMB6650vlttl6iRdetXk47XxeyoDararOI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WMUpS0nE+feQZT0P2dxs67bd7UTmlq4RA4zTMtf/ixf6buG3FgNgnDH/JswhlOmzLUVit99vGePfpiLmj2fQ4KyrTUQxzOC9HGbPsiyGOJ6VwHyJQQjx0OEESuLpkHpE8XUNXfGKga9SSU1q7aOdvqj97dCg8Q6giY38pV7C5mQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=EUvyeNef; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="EUvyeNef" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net B9E3E403FA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1738166294; bh=tjfdSmbQZktN5AnxF530CGf5ncUa+GaO91f0NTTVYT8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=EUvyeNefOLOVUnMaofBK1H3VrSTLnaSlL87jx7p1D8vCpTe//kPARa/vTp8vnI9eh ZcG53tpMFiswUuYASOHls3F6Vg5XW9ch6xNSsazTupEasEYPFW2nOxt8Ri1SOg0qfC cSwBXy7FWpxJvTRK+yKEISaHvGCbkKNyRXvpdUVR/Rpkf6uDT7Io/vRbNDEnkIiO4D PV60yuvuSfVyxJctDKDNc+e/lbPZncho4w6bcVdj29uUH8jLc9KZnRB9LTDvIw7oe2 mxBi4mFGEzdiqrwARkBYV5Gts0IDzSHT0Em/bRXG67PywB1R9Lrhr6sg6omcQPSl2O ryOWxxYoG1cWw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9E3E403FA; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 15:58:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/38] Improve ABI documentation generation In-Reply-To: <20250129164157.3c7c072d@foz.lan> References: <87h65i7e87.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20250129164157.3c7c072d@foz.lan> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:58:13 -0700 Message-ID: <87a5b96296.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > So, I'm proposing to change the minimal requirements to: > - Sphinx 3.4.3; > - Python 3.9 > > By setting Sphinx minimal version to 3.4.3, we can get rid of all > Sphinx backward-compatible code. That's certainly a nice thought. With regard to Python ... are all reasonable distributions at 3.9 at least? CentOS 9 seems to be there, and Debian beyond it. So probably that is a reasonable floor to set? jon