netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Haowei Yan <g1042620637@gmail.com>,
	Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] l2tp: Serialize access to sk_user_data with sock lock
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:56:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a682x3ny.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817085118.0c45c690@kernel.org>

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 08:51 AM -07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:33:33 +0200 Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> > Note to other netdev maintainers that based on the discussion about 
>> > the reuseport locking it's unclear whether we shouldn't also take 
>> > the callback lock...  
>> 
>> You're right. reuseport_array, psock, and kcm protect sk_user_data with
>> the callback lock, not the sock lock. Need to fix it.
>
> Where 'it' == current patch? Would you mind adding to the kdoc on
> sk_user_data that it's protected by the callback lock while at it?

Yes, will prepare a v3 for review. Sorry, should have been explicit.

Will add a kdoc. Great idea.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-17 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-15 13:01 [PATCH net v2] l2tp: Serialize access to sk_user_data with sock lock Jakub Sitnicki
2022-08-15 13:21 ` Tom Parkin
2022-08-15 13:26   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2022-08-15 13:39     ` Tom Parkin
2022-08-17  1:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-17 14:33   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2022-08-17 15:51     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-17 15:56       ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a682x3ny.fsf@cloudflare.com \
    --to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=g1042620637@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tparkin@katalix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).