From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt.kanzenbach@linutronix.de>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
olteanv@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: sja1105: Fix return value check in sja1105_ptp_clock_register()
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:10:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6vlspe5.fsf@kurt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112145532.38320-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1576 bytes --]
On Thu Nov 12 2020, YueHaibing wrote:
> drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c:869 sja1105_ptp_clock_register() warn: passing zero to 'PTR_ERR'
>
> ptp_clock_register() returns ERR_PTR() and never returns
> NULL. The NULL test should be removed.
Which is not true. From the documentation:
* Returns a valid pointer on success or PTR_ERR on failure. If PHC
* support is missing at the configuration level, this function
* returns NULL, and drivers are expected to gracefully handle that
* case separately.
Please, always Cc Richard for PTP patches.
Actually you can have a look at this discussion here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/netdev/1605086686-5140-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com/
>
> Fixes: bb77f36ac21d ("net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for the PTP clock")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c
> index 1b90570b257b..1e41d491c854 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_ptp.c
> @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ int sja1105_ptp_clock_register(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> spin_lock_init(&tagger_data->meta_lock);
>
> ptp_data->clock = ptp_clock_register(&ptp_data->caps, ds->dev);
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptp_data->clock))
> + if (IS_ERR(ptp_data->clock))
When you do this, you'll have to make sure that the driver handles the
NULL case "gracefully".
Thanks,
Kurt
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-13 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 14:55 [PATCH] net: dsa: sja1105: Fix return value check in sja1105_ptp_clock_register() YueHaibing
2020-11-13 7:10 ` Kurt Kanzenbach [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6vlspe5.fsf@kurt \
--to=kurt.kanzenbach@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).