From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/10] bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:16:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6xioydh.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzY4UR+KjZ3bY6ykyW5CPNwAzwgKVhYHGdgDuMT2nntmTg@mail.gmail.com>
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 4:50 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>>
>> The check_attach_btf_id() function really does three things:
>>
>> 1. It performs a bunch of checks on the program to ensure that the
>> attachment is valid.
>>
>> 2. It stores a bunch of state about the attachment being requested in
>> the verifier environment and struct bpf_prog objects.
>>
>> 3. It allocates a trampoline for the attachment.
>>
>> This patch splits out (1.) and (3.) into separate functions in preparation
>> for reusing them when the actual attachment is happening (in the
>> raw_tracepoint_open syscall operation), which will allow tracing programs
>> to have multiple (compatible) attachments.
>>
>> No functional change is intended with this patch.
>>
>> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> Ok, so bad news: you broke another selftest (test_overhead). Please,
> do run test_progs and make sure everything succeeds, every time before
> you post a new version.
Right, so I looked into this, and it seems the only reason it was
succeeding before were those skipped checks you pointed out that are now
fixed. I.e., __set_task_comm() is not actually supposed to be
fmod_ret'able according to check_attach_modify_return(). So I'm not sure
what the right way to fix this is?
The fmod_ret bit was added to test_overhead by:
4eaf0b5c5e04 ("selftest/bpf: Fmod_ret prog and implement test_overhead as part of bench")
so the obvious thing is to just do a (partial) revert of that? WDYT?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-19 11:49 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/10] bpf: disallow attaching modify_return tracing functions to other BPF programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-21 22:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-22 9:52 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/10] bpf: change logging calls from verbose() to bpf_log() and use log pointer Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/10] bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id() Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-21 23:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-22 10:14 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-22 11:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2020-09-22 16:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-22 17:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/10] bpf: move prog->aux->linked_prog and trampoline into bpf_link on attach Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-21 23:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-22 10:17 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-22 16:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-22 17:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/10] bpf: support attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-21 23:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/10] bpf: Fix context type resolving for extension programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-21 23:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/10] libbpf: add support for freplace attachment in bpf_link_create Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-21 23:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/10] selftests: add test for multiple attachments of freplace program Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-21 23:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/10] selftests/bpf: Adding test for arg dereference in extension trace Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-19 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/10] selftests: Add selftest for disallowing modify_return attachment to freplace Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-21 23:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-21 23:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/10] bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-22 9:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6xioydh.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).