From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:28:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8p92iy2.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56727EE9.5020805@stressinduktion.org> (Hannes Frederic Sowa's message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:22:49 +0100")
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> writes:
> On 16.12.2015 21:09, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> With b3ca9b02b00704053a38bfe4c31dbbb9c13595d0, the AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM
>> receive code was changed from using mutex_lock(&u->readlock) to
>> mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock) to prevent signals from being
>> delayed for an indefinite time if a thread sleeping on the mutex
>> happened to be selected for handling the signal. But this was never a
>> problem with the stream receive code (as opposed to its datagram
>> counterpart) as that never went to sleep waiting for new messages with the
>> mutex held and thus, wouldn't cause secondary readers to block on the
>> mutex waiting for the sleeping primary reader. As the interruptible
>> locking makes the code more complicated in exchange for no benefit,
>> change it back to using mutex_lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Considering that the datagram receive routine also doesn't go the sleep
>> with the mutex held anymore, the 37ab4fa7844a044dc21fde45e2a0fc2f3c3b6490
>> change to unix_autobind is now similarly purposeless.
>
> I wouldn't do this conversion, yet. There is still a deadlock lingering
> around which should be solved earlier:
>
> http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2015/11/10/4
>
> Unfortunately I haven't found a good way how to solve it, yet.
Judging from the link, that's not related to the stream receive code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-16 20:09 [PATCH] af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code Rainer Weikusat
2015-12-17 9:22 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-12-17 15:28 ` Rainer Weikusat [this message]
2015-12-17 15:43 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-12-17 23:26 ` Rainer Weikusat
2015-12-18 16:04 ` splice-bind deadlock (was: [PATCH] af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code) Rainer Weikusat
2015-12-17 20:34 ` [PATCH] af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a8p92iy2.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com \
--to=rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).