From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
Subject: Re: E1000E/82567LM-3: link reported up too soon
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:22:56 +0200
Message-ID: <87aanci2qn.fsf@small.ssi.corp>
References: <878w2wnsyd.fsf@small.ssi.corp>
	<20100920.125447.220082714.davem@davemloft.net>
	<87y6awjhxv.fsf@small.ssi.corp>
	<20100920.131839.173838219.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: brian.haley@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from copper.chdir.org ([88.191.97.87]:37234 "EHLO copper.chdir.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932150Ab0ITUWL (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:22:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20100920.131839.173838219.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's
	message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:18:39 -0700 (PDT)")
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>


David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:

> So do both DHCP request and the IPV6 RS get dropped, or just the IPV6 RS?

both.