From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] c/r: Add AF_INET support (v3) Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:30:24 -0700 Message-ID: <87ab3fqjjj.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> References: <1246994776-1882-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <1246994776-1882-3-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <4A54A61A.30307@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Alexey Dobriyan To: Oren Laadan Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org OL> The live c/r of open connections is very useful for process OL> migration. For other scenarios (e.g. fault recovery in HPC) it OL> does not matter that much. Perhaps it makes sense to shelve the INET patch for a while until we can get the UNIX patch worked into decent shape? OL> Are you certain that none of the values below needs to be OL> sanitized before put in the kernel ? No. I removed the "I'm sure there are lots of holes here" comment so as not to scare off the netdev folks. In case it's not (painfully) obvious, the UNIX patch has gotten significantly more attention so far. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org