From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard) Subject: Re: [bisected] Weird sysctl regression Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:53:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87abf21snj.fsf@natisbad.org> References: <87fxoyal9j.fsf@natisbad.org> <20080823084936.GK28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87wsi7en1m.fsf@natisbad.org> <20080823170248.GL28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87ljynd582.fsf@natisbad.org> <20080823181651.GM28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87od3jo2vn.fsf@natisbad.org> <20080824115424.GP28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller To: Al Viro Return-path: Received: from moog.chdir.org ([88.191.42.160]:44527 "EHLO moog.chdir.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752871AbYHXMyW (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:54:22 -0400 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Al Viro writes: >> Sorry for the delay. Yes, no additional patches in both cases: >> >> - stock 2.6.27-rc4 from kernel.org >> - freshly cloned net-next-2.6 after David's announcement > > Gyah... Dumb braino on my part. That sucker should've gone into the > global class, not the rotable stuff. See if that helps... It does! I just recompiled net-next-2.6 (2.6.27-rc4 based) with the patch applied and my /proc/sys/net/ is as it should be, i.e. with a single and usable 'ipv6' entry. Thanks for your work. Cheers, a+