[PATCH bpf v9 0/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation and add tests

[PATCH bpf v9 0/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation and add tests

[Jiayuan Chen]

A previous commit described in this topic
http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523025618.113937-9-john.fastabend@gmail.com
directly updated 'sk->copied_seq' in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the
action of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS,
the update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to
tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature.

That commit works for a single stream_verdict scenario, as it also
modified 'sk_data_ready->sk_psock_verdict_data_ready->tcp_read_skb'
to remove updating 'sk->copied_seq'.

However, for programs where both stream_parser and stream_verdict are
active (strparser purpose), tcp_read_sock() was used instead of
tcp_read_skb() (sk_data_ready->strp_data_ready->tcp_read_sock).
tcp_read_sock() now still updates 'sk->copied_seq', leading to duplicated
updates.

In summary, for strparser + SK_PASS, copied_seq is redundantly calculated
in both tcp_read_sock() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().

The issue causes incorrect copied_seq calculations, which prevent
correct data reads from the recv() interface in user-land.

Also we added test cases for bpf + strparser and separated them from
sockmap_basic, as strparser has more encapsulation and parsing
capabilities compared to sockmap.

---
V8 -> v9
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250121050707.55523-1-mrpre@163.com/
Fixed some issues suggested by Jakub Sitnicki.

V7 -> V8
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250116140531.108636-1-mrpre@163.com/
Avoid using add read_sock to psock. (Jakub Sitnicki)
Avoid using warpper function to check whether strparser is supported.

V3 -> V7:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250109094402.50838-1-mrpre@163.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241218053408.437295-1-mrpre@163.com/
Avoid introducing new proto_ops. (Jakub Sitnicki).
Add more edge test cases for strparser + bpf.
Fix patchwork fail of test cases code.
Fix psock fetch without rcu lock.
Move code of modifying to tcp_bpf.c.

V1 -> V3:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241209152740.281125-1-mrpre@163.com/
Fix patchwork fail by adding Fixes tag.
Save skb data offset for ENOMEM. (John Fastabend)
---

Jiayuan Chen (5):
  strparser: add read_sock callback
  bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation
  bpf: disable non stream socket for strparser
  selftests/bpf: fix invalid flag of recv()
  selftests/bpf: add strparser test for bpf

 Documentation/networking/strparser.rst        |   9 +-
 include/linux/skmsg.h                         |   2 +
 include/net/strparser.h                       |   2 +
 include/net/tcp.h                             |   8 +
 net/core/skmsg.c                              |   7 +
 net/core/sock_map.c                           |   5 +-
 net/ipv4/tcp.c                                |  29 +-
 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c                            |  36 ++
 net/strparser/strparser.c                     |  11 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  |  59 +--
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_strp.c   | 454 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_strp.c   |  53 ++
 12 files changed, 610 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_strp.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_strp.c

-- 
2.43.5

[PATCH bpf v9 1/5] strparser: add read_sock callback

[Jiayuan Chen]

Added a new read_sock handler, allowing users to customize read operations
instead of relying on the native socket's read_sock.

Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
---
 Documentation/networking/strparser.rst |  9 ++++++++-
 include/net/strparser.h                |  2 ++
 net/strparser/strparser.c              | 11 +++++++++--
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/strparser.rst b/Documentation/networking/strparser.rst
index 6cab1f74ae05..7f623d1db72a 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/strparser.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/strparser.rst
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ Functions
 Callbacks
 =========
 
-There are six callbacks:
+There are seven callbacks:
 
     ::
 
@@ -182,6 +182,13 @@ There are six callbacks:
     the length of the message. skb->len - offset may be greater
     then full_len since strparser does not trim the skb.
 
+    ::
+
+	int (*read_sock)(struct strparser *strp, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+                     sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
+
+    The read_sock callback is used by strparser instead of
+    sock->ops->read_sock, if provided.
     ::
 
 	int (*read_sock_done)(struct strparser *strp, int err);
diff --git a/include/net/strparser.h b/include/net/strparser.h
index 41e2ce9e9e10..0a83010b3a64 100644
--- a/include/net/strparser.h
+++ b/include/net/strparser.h
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ struct strparser;
 struct strp_callbacks {
 	int (*parse_msg)(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb);
 	void (*rcv_msg)(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb);
+	int (*read_sock)(struct strparser *strp, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+			 sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
 	int (*read_sock_done)(struct strparser *strp, int err);
 	void (*abort_parser)(struct strparser *strp, int err);
 	void (*lock)(struct strparser *strp);
diff --git a/net/strparser/strparser.c b/net/strparser/strparser.c
index 8299ceb3e373..95696f42647e 100644
--- a/net/strparser/strparser.c
+++ b/net/strparser/strparser.c
@@ -347,7 +347,10 @@ static int strp_read_sock(struct strparser *strp)
 	struct socket *sock = strp->sk->sk_socket;
 	read_descriptor_t desc;
 
-	if (unlikely(!sock || !sock->ops || !sock->ops->read_sock))
+	if (unlikely(!sock || !sock->ops))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	if (unlikely(!strp->cb.read_sock && !sock->ops->read_sock))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	desc.arg.data = strp;
@@ -355,7 +358,10 @@ static int strp_read_sock(struct strparser *strp)
 	desc.count = 1; /* give more than one skb per call */
 
 	/* sk should be locked here, so okay to do read_sock */
-	sock->ops->read_sock(strp->sk, &desc, strp_recv);
+	if (strp->cb.read_sock)
+		strp->cb.read_sock(strp, &desc, strp_recv);
+	else
+		sock->ops->read_sock(strp->sk, &desc, strp_recv);
 
 	desc.error = strp->cb.read_sock_done(strp, desc.error);
 
@@ -468,6 +474,7 @@ int strp_init(struct strparser *strp, struct sock *sk,
 	strp->cb.unlock = cb->unlock ? : strp_sock_unlock;
 	strp->cb.rcv_msg = cb->rcv_msg;
 	strp->cb.parse_msg = cb->parse_msg;
+	strp->cb.read_sock = cb->read_sock;
 	strp->cb.read_sock_done = cb->read_sock_done ? : default_read_sock_done;
 	strp->cb.abort_parser = cb->abort_parser ? : strp_abort_strp;
 
-- 
2.43.5

Re: [PATCH bpf v9 1/5] strparser: add read_sock callback

[Jakub Sitnicki]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 06:09 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> Added a new read_sock handler, allowing users to customize read operations
> instead of relying on the native socket's read_sock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>

[PATCH bpf v9 2/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation

[Jiayuan Chen]

'sk->copied_seq' was updated in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the action
of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS, the
update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser()
to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature.

It works for a single stream_verdict scenario, as it also modified
sk_data_ready->sk_psock_verdict_data_ready->tcp_read_skb
to remove updating 'sk->copied_seq'.

However, for programs where both stream_parser and stream_verdict are
active (strparser purpose), tcp_read_sock() was used instead of
tcp_read_skb() (sk_data_ready->strp_data_ready->tcp_read_sock).
tcp_read_sock() now still updates 'sk->copied_seq', leading to duplicate
updates.

In summary, for strparser + SK_PASS, copied_seq is redundantly calculated
in both tcp_read_sock() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().

The issue causes incorrect copied_seq calculations, which prevent
correct data reads from the recv() interface in user-land.

We do not want to add new proto_ops to implement a new version of
tcp_read_sock, as this would introduce code complexity [1].

We could have added noack and copied_seq to desc, and then called
ops->read_sock. However, unfortunately, other modules didn’t fully
initialize desc to zero. So, for now, we are directly calling
tcp_read_sock_noack() in tcp_bpf.c.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241218053408.437295-1-mrpre@163.com
Fixes: e5c6de5fa025 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq")
Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
---
 include/linux/skmsg.h |  2 ++
 include/net/tcp.h     |  8 ++++++++
 net/core/skmsg.c      |  7 +++++++
 net/ipv4/tcp.c        | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c    | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
index 2cbe0c22a32f..0b9095a281b8 100644
--- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
+++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ struct sk_psock {
 	struct sk_psock_progs		progs;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
 	struct strparser		strp;
+	u32				copied_seq;
+	u32				ingress_bytes;
 #endif
 	struct sk_buff_head		ingress_skb;
 	struct list_head		ingress_msg;
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index e9b37b76e894..06affc653247 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -729,6 +729,9 @@ void tcp_get_info(struct sock *, struct tcp_info *);
 /* Read 'sendfile()'-style from a TCP socket */
 int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
 		  sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
+int tcp_read_sock_noack(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+			sk_read_actor_t recv_actor, bool noack,
+			u32 *copied_seq);
 int tcp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor);
 struct sk_buff *tcp_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 *off);
 void tcp_read_done(struct sock *sk, size_t len);
@@ -2599,6 +2602,11 @@ struct sk_psock;
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool restore);
 void tcp_bpf_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk);
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER
+struct strparser;
+int tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock(struct strparser *strp, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+			   sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
+#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER */
 #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_INET
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 61f3f3d4e528..0ddc4c718833 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -549,6 +549,9 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb,
 			return num_sge;
 	}
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
+	psock->ingress_bytes += len;
+#endif
 	copied = len;
 	msg->sg.start = 0;
 	msg->sg.size = copied;
@@ -1144,6 +1147,10 @@ int sk_psock_init_strp(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock)
 	if (!ret)
 		sk_psock_set_state(psock, SK_PSOCK_RX_STRP_ENABLED);
 
+	if (sk_is_tcp(sk)) {
+		psock->strp.cb.read_sock = tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock;
+		psock->copied_seq = tcp_sk(sk)->copied_seq;
+	}
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 0d704bda6c41..285678d8ce07 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1565,12 +1565,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_recv_skb);
  *	  or for 'peeking' the socket using this routine
  *	  (although both would be easy to implement).
  */
-int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
-		  sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
+static int __tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+			   sk_read_actor_t recv_actor, bool noack,
+			   u32 *copied_seq)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
-	u32 seq = tp->copied_seq;
+	u32 seq = *copied_seq;
 	u32 offset;
 	int copied = 0;
 
@@ -1624,9 +1625,12 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
 		tcp_eat_recv_skb(sk, skb);
 		if (!desc->count)
 			break;
-		WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, seq);
+		WRITE_ONCE(*copied_seq, seq);
 	}
-	WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, seq);
+	WRITE_ONCE(*copied_seq, seq);
+
+	if (noack)
+		goto out;
 
 	tcp_rcv_space_adjust(sk);
 
@@ -1635,10 +1639,25 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
 		tcp_recv_skb(sk, seq, &offset);
 		tcp_cleanup_rbuf(sk, copied);
 	}
+out:
 	return copied;
 }
+
+int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+		  sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
+{
+	return __tcp_read_sock(sk, desc, recv_actor, false,
+			       &tcp_sk(sk)->copied_seq);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_read_sock);
 
+int tcp_read_sock_noack(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+			sk_read_actor_t recv_actor, bool noack,
+			u32 *copied_seq)
+{
+	return __tcp_read_sock(sk, desc, recv_actor, noack, copied_seq);
+}
+
 int tcp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index 47f65b1b70ca..ba581785adb4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -646,6 +646,42 @@ static int tcp_bpf_assert_proto_ops(struct proto *ops)
 	       ops->sendmsg  == tcp_sendmsg ? 0 : -ENOTSUPP;
 }
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
+int tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock(struct strparser *strp, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+			   sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
+{
+	struct sock *sk = strp->sk;
+	struct sk_psock *psock;
+	struct tcp_sock *tp;
+	int copied = 0;
+
+	tp = tcp_sk(sk);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	psock = sk_psock(sk);
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!psock)) {
+		desc->error = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	psock->ingress_bytes = 0;
+	copied = tcp_read_sock_noack(sk, desc, recv_actor, true,
+				     &psock->copied_seq);
+	if (copied < 0)
+		goto out;
+	/* recv_actor may redirect skb to another socket (SK_REDIRECT) or
+	 * just put skb into ingress queue of current socket (SK_PASS).
+	 * For SK_REDIRECT, we need to ack the frame immediately but for
+	 * SK_PASS, we want to delay the ack until tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().
+	 */
+	tp->copied_seq = psock->copied_seq - psock->ingress_bytes;
+	tcp_rcv_space_adjust(sk);
+	__tcp_cleanup_rbuf(sk, copied - psock->ingress_bytes);
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return copied;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER */
+
 int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool restore)
 {
 	int family = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TCP_BPF_IPV6 : TCP_BPF_IPV4;
-- 
2.43.5

Re: [PATCH bpf v9 2/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation

[Jakub Sitnicki]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 06:09 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> 'sk->copied_seq' was updated in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the action
> of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS, the
> update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser()
> to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature.
>
> It works for a single stream_verdict scenario, as it also modified
> sk_data_ready->sk_psock_verdict_data_ready->tcp_read_skb
> to remove updating 'sk->copied_seq'.
>
> However, for programs where both stream_parser and stream_verdict are
> active (strparser purpose), tcp_read_sock() was used instead of
> tcp_read_skb() (sk_data_ready->strp_data_ready->tcp_read_sock).
> tcp_read_sock() now still updates 'sk->copied_seq', leading to duplicate
> updates.
>
> In summary, for strparser + SK_PASS, copied_seq is redundantly calculated
> in both tcp_read_sock() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().
>
> The issue causes incorrect copied_seq calculations, which prevent
> correct data reads from the recv() interface in user-land.
>
> We do not want to add new proto_ops to implement a new version of
> tcp_read_sock, as this would introduce code complexity [1].
>
> We could have added noack and copied_seq to desc, and then called
> ops->read_sock. However, unfortunately, other modules didn’t fully
> initialize desc to zero. So, for now, we are directly calling
> tcp_read_sock_noack() in tcp_bpf.c.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241218053408.437295-1-mrpre@163.com
> Fixes: e5c6de5fa025 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq")
> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
> ---

I'm happy with how this turned out, but let's run it by Eric.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>

[PATCH bpf v9 3/5] bpf: disable non stream socket for strparser

[Jiayuan Chen]

Currently, only TCP supports strparser, but sockmap doesn't intercept
non-TCP connections to attach strparser. For example, with UDP, although
the read/write handlers are replaced, strparser is not executed due to
the lack of a read_sock operation.

Furthermore, in udp_bpf_recvmsg(), it checks whether the psock has data,
and if not, it falls back to the native UDP read interface, making
UDP + strparser appear to read correctly. According to its commit history,
this behavior is unexpected.

Moreover, since UDP lacks the concept of streams, we intercept it directly.

Fixes: 1fa1fe8ff161 ("bpf, sockmap: Test shutdown() correctly exits epoll and recv()=0")
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index f1b9b3958792..3b0f59d9b4db 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -303,7 +303,10 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
 
 	write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
 	if (stream_parser && stream_verdict && !psock->saved_data_ready) {
-		ret = sk_psock_init_strp(sk, psock);
+		if (sk_is_tcp(sk))
+			ret = sk_psock_init_strp(sk, psock);
+		else
+			ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		if (ret) {
 			write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
 			sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
-- 
2.43.5

Re: [PATCH bpf v9 3/5] bpf: disable non stream socket for strparser

[Jakub Sitnicki]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 06:09 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> Currently, only TCP supports strparser, but sockmap doesn't intercept
> non-TCP connections to attach strparser. For example, with UDP, although
> the read/write handlers are replaced, strparser is not executed due to
> the lack of a read_sock operation.
>
> Furthermore, in udp_bpf_recvmsg(), it checks whether the psock has data,
> and if not, it falls back to the native UDP read interface, making
> UDP + strparser appear to read correctly. According to its commit history,
> this behavior is unexpected.
>
> Moreover, since UDP lacks the concept of streams, we intercept it directly.
>
> Fixes: 1fa1fe8ff161 ("bpf, sockmap: Test shutdown() correctly exits epoll and recv()=0")
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>

[PATCH bpf v9 4/5] selftests/bpf: fix invalid flag of recv()

[Jiayuan Chen]

SOCK_NONBLOCK flag is only effective during socket creation, not during
recv. Use MSG_DONTWAIT instead.

Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index 884ad87783d5..0c51b7288978 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -522,8 +522,8 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown(void)
 	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 1, "epoll_wait(fd)"))
 		goto out_close;
 
-	n = recv(c1, &b, 1, SOCK_NONBLOCK);
-	ASSERT_EQ(n, 0, "recv_timeout(fin)");
+	n = recv(c1, &b, 1, MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	ASSERT_EQ(n, 0, "recv(fin)");
 out_close:
 	close(c1);
 	close(p1);
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(bool pass_prog)
 	ASSERT_EQ(avail, expected, "ioctl(FIONREAD)");
 	/* On DROP test there will be no data to read */
 	if (pass_prog) {
-		recvd = recv_timeout(c1, &buf, sizeof(buf), SOCK_NONBLOCK, IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+		recvd = recv_timeout(c1, &buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_DONTWAIT, IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
 		ASSERT_EQ(recvd, sizeof(buf), "recv_timeout(c0)");
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.5

Re: [PATCH bpf v9 4/5] selftests/bpf: fix invalid flag of recv()

[Jakub Sitnicki]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 06:09 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> SOCK_NONBLOCK flag is only effective during socket creation, not during
> recv. Use MSG_DONTWAIT instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>

[PATCH bpf v9 5/5] selftests/bpf: add strparser test for bpf

[Jiayuan Chen]

Add test cases for bpf + strparser and separated them from
sockmap_basic, as strparser has more encapsulation and parsing
capabilities compared to standard sockmap.

Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  |  53 --
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_strp.c   | 454 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_strp.c   |  53 ++
 3 files changed, 507 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_strp.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_strp.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index 0c51b7288978..f8953455db29 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -531,57 +531,6 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown(void)
 	test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-static void test_sockmap_stream_pass(void)
-{
-	int zero = 0, sent, recvd;
-	int verdict, parser;
-	int err, map;
-	int c = -1, p = -1;
-	struct test_sockmap_pass_prog *pass = NULL;
-	char snd[256] = "0123456789";
-	char rcv[256] = "0";
-
-	pass = test_sockmap_pass_prog__open_and_load();
-	verdict = bpf_program__fd(pass->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
-	parser = bpf_program__fd(pass->progs.prog_skb_parser);
-	map = bpf_map__fd(pass->maps.sock_map_rx);
-
-	err = bpf_prog_attach(parser, map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER, 0);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach stream parser"))
-		goto out;
-
-	err = bpf_prog_attach(verdict, map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT, 0);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach stream verdict"))
-		goto out;
-
-	err = create_pair(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, &c, &p);
-	if (err)
-		goto out;
-
-	/* sk_data_ready of 'p' will be replaced by strparser handler */
-	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &p, BPF_NOEXIST);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(p)"))
-		goto out_close;
-
-	/*
-	 * as 'prog_skb_parser' return the original skb len and
-	 * 'prog_skb_verdict' return SK_PASS, the kernel will just
-	 * pass it through to original socket 'p'
-	 */
-	sent = xsend(c, snd, sizeof(snd), 0);
-	ASSERT_EQ(sent, sizeof(snd), "xsend(c)");
-
-	recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, sizeof(rcv), SOCK_NONBLOCK,
-			     IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
-	ASSERT_EQ(recvd, sizeof(rcv), "recv_timeout(p)");
-
-out_close:
-	close(c);
-	close(p);
-
-out:
-	test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(pass);
-}
 
 static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(bool pass_prog)
 {
@@ -1101,8 +1050,6 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
 		test_sockmap_progs_query(BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict shutdown"))
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown();
-	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap stream parser and verdict pass"))
-		test_sockmap_stream_pass();
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict fionread"))
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(true);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict fionread on drop"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_strp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_strp.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..621b3b71888e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_strp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,454 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <error.h>
+#include <netinet/tcp.h>
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "sockmap_helpers.h"
+#include "test_skmsg_load_helpers.skel.h"
+#include "test_sockmap_strp.skel.h"
+
+#define STRP_PKT_HEAD_LEN 4
+#define STRP_PKT_BODY_LEN 6
+#define STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN (STRP_PKT_HEAD_LEN + STRP_PKT_BODY_LEN)
+
+static const char packet[STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN] = "head+body\0";
+static const int test_packet_num = 100;
+
+/* Current implementation of tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() invokes data_ready
+ * with sk held if an skb exists in sk_receive_queue. Then for the
+ * data_ready implementation of strparser, it will delay the read
+ * operation if sk is held and EAGAIN is returned.
+ */
+static int sockmap_strp_consume_pre_data(int p)
+{
+	int recvd;
+	bool retried = false;
+	char rcv[10];
+
+retry:
+	errno = 0;
+	recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, sizeof(rcv), 0, 1);
+	if (recvd < 0 && errno == EAGAIN && retried == false) {
+		/* On the first call, EAGAIN will certainly be returned.
+		 * A 1-second wait is enough for the workqueue to finish.
+		 */
+		sleep(1);
+		retried = true;
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, "recv error or truncated data") ||
+	    !ASSERT_OK(memcmp(packet, rcv, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN),
+				"data mismatch"))
+		return -1;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct test_sockmap_strp *sockmap_strp_init(int *out_map, bool pass,
+						   bool need_parser)
+{
+	struct test_sockmap_strp *strp = NULL;
+	int verdict, parser;
+	int err;
+
+	strp = test_sockmap_strp__open_and_load();
+	*out_map = bpf_map__fd(strp->maps.sock_map);
+
+	if (need_parser)
+		parser = bpf_program__fd(strp->progs.prog_skb_parser_partial);
+	else
+		parser = bpf_program__fd(strp->progs.prog_skb_parser);
+
+	if (pass)
+		verdict = bpf_program__fd(strp->progs.prog_skb_verdict_pass);
+	else
+		verdict = bpf_program__fd(strp->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
+
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(parser, *out_map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach stream parser"))
+		goto err;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(verdict, *out_map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach stream verdict"))
+		goto err;
+
+	return strp;
+err:
+	test_sockmap_strp__destroy(strp);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/* Dispatch packets to different socket by packet size:
+ *
+ *                      ------  ------
+ *                     | pkt4 || pkt1 |... > remote socket
+ *  ------ ------     / ------  ------
+ * | pkt8 | pkt7 |...
+ *  ------ ------     \ ------  ------
+ *                     | pkt3 || pkt2 |... > local socket
+ *                      ------  ------
+ */
+static void test_sockmap_strp_dispatch_pkt(int family, int sotype)
+{
+	int i, j, zero = 0, one = 1, recvd;
+	int err, map;
+	int c0 = -1, p0 = -1, c1 = -1, p1 = -1;
+	struct test_sockmap_strp *strp = NULL;
+	int test_cnt = 6;
+	char rcv[10];
+	struct {
+		char	data[7];
+		int	data_len;
+		int	send_cnt;
+		int	*receiver;
+	} send_dir[2] = {
+		/* data expected to deliver to local */
+		{"llllll", 6, 0, &p0},
+		/* data expected to deliver to remote */
+		{"rrrrr",  5, 0, &c1}
+	};
+
+	strp = sockmap_strp_init(&map, false, false);
+	if (!ASSERT_TRUE(strp, "sockmap_strp_init"))
+		return;
+
+	err = create_socket_pairs(family, sotype, &c0, &c1, &p0, &p1);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "create_socket_pairs()"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &p0, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(p0)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &one, &p1, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(p1)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	err = setsockopt(c1, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &zero, sizeof(zero));
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* deliver data with data size greater than 5 to local */
+	strp->data->verdict_max_size = 5;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < test_cnt; i++) {
+		int d = i % 2;
+
+		xsend(c0, send_dir[d].data, send_dir[d].data_len, 0);
+		send_dir[d].send_cnt++;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+		for (j = 0; j < send_dir[i].send_cnt; j++) {
+			int expected = send_dir[i].data_len;
+
+			recvd = recv_timeout(*send_dir[i].receiver, rcv,
+					     expected, MSG_DONTWAIT,
+					     IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+			if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, expected, "recv_timeout()"))
+				goto out_close;
+			if (!ASSERT_OK(memcmp(send_dir[i].data, rcv, recvd),
+				       "data mismatch"))
+				goto out_close;
+		}
+	}
+out_close:
+	close(c0);
+	close(c1);
+	close(p0);
+	close(p1);
+out:
+	test_sockmap_strp__destroy(strp);
+}
+
+/* We have multiple packets in one skb
+ * ------------ ------------ ------------
+ * |  packet1  |   packet2  |  ...
+ * ------------ ------------ ------------
+ */
+static void test_sockmap_strp_multiple_pkt(int family, int sotype)
+{
+	int i, zero = 0;
+	int sent, recvd, total;
+	int err, map;
+	int c = -1, p = -1;
+	struct test_sockmap_strp *strp = NULL;
+	char *snd = NULL, *rcv = NULL;
+
+	strp = sockmap_strp_init(&map, true, true);
+	if (!ASSERT_TRUE(strp, "sockmap_strp_init"))
+		return;
+
+	err = create_pair(family, sotype, &c, &p);
+	if (err)
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &p, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(zero, p)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* construct multiple packets in one buffer */
+	total = test_packet_num * STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN;
+	snd = malloc(total);
+	rcv = malloc(total + 1);
+	if (!ASSERT_TRUE(snd, "malloc(snd)") ||
+	    !ASSERT_TRUE(rcv, "malloc(rcv)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < test_packet_num; i++) {
+		memcpy(snd + i * STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN,
+		       packet, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN);
+	}
+
+	sent = xsend(c, snd, total, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(sent, total, "xsend(c)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* try to recv one more byte to avoid truncation check */
+	recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, total + 1, MSG_DONTWAIT, IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, total, "recv(rcv)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* we sent TCP segment with multiple encapsulation
+	 * then check whether packets are handled correctly
+	 */
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(memcmp(snd, rcv, total), "data mismatch"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+out_close:
+	close(c);
+	close(p);
+	if (snd)
+		free(snd);
+	if (rcv)
+		free(rcv);
+out:
+	test_sockmap_strp__destroy(strp);
+}
+
+/* Test strparser with partial read */
+static void test_sockmap_strp_partial_read(int family, int sotype)
+{
+	int zero = 0, recvd, off;
+	int err, map;
+	int c = -1, p = -1;
+	struct test_sockmap_strp *strp = NULL;
+	char rcv[STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN + 1] = "0";
+
+	strp = sockmap_strp_init(&map, true, true);
+	if (!ASSERT_TRUE(strp, "sockmap_strp_init"))
+		return;
+
+	err = create_pair(family, sotype, &c, &p);
+	if (err)
+		goto out;
+
+	/* sk_data_ready of 'p' will be replaced by strparser handler */
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &p, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(zero, p)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* 1.1 send partial head, 1 byte header left */
+	off = STRP_PKT_HEAD_LEN - 1;
+	xsend(c, packet, off, 0);
+	recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, sizeof(rcv), MSG_DONTWAIT, 1);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(-1, recvd, "partial head sent, expected no data"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* 1.2 send remaining head and body */
+	xsend(c, packet + off, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN - off, 0);
+	recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, sizeof(rcv), MSG_DONTWAIT, IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, "expected full data"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* 2.1 send partial head, 1 byte header left */
+	off = STRP_PKT_HEAD_LEN - 1;
+	xsend(c, packet, off, 0);
+
+	/* 2.2 send remaining head and partial body, 1 byte body left */
+	xsend(c, packet + off, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN - off - 1, 0);
+	off = STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN - 1;
+	recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, sizeof(rcv), MSG_DONTWAIT, 1);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(-1, recvd, "partial body sent, expected no data"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* 2.3 send remaining body */
+	xsend(c, packet + off, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN - off, 0);
+	recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, sizeof(rcv), MSG_DONTWAIT, IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, "expected full data"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+out_close:
+	close(c);
+	close(p);
+
+out:
+	test_sockmap_strp__destroy(strp);
+}
+
+/* Test simple socket read/write with strparser + FIONREAD */
+static void test_sockmap_strp_pass(int family, int sotype, bool fionread)
+{
+	int zero = 0, pkt_size = STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, sent, recvd, avail;
+	int err, map;
+	int c = -1, p = -1;
+	int test_cnt = 10, i;
+	struct test_sockmap_strp *strp = NULL;
+	char rcv[STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN + 1] = "0";
+
+	strp = sockmap_strp_init(&map, true, true);
+	if (!ASSERT_TRUE(strp, "sockmap_strp_init"))
+		return;
+
+	err = create_pair(family, sotype, &c, &p);
+	if (err)
+		goto out;
+
+	/* inject some data before bpf process, it should be read
+	 * correctly because we check sk_receive_queue in
+	 * tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().
+	 */
+	sent = xsend(c, packet, pkt_size, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(sent, pkt_size, "xsend(pre-data)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* sk_data_ready of 'p' will be replaced by strparser handler */
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &p, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(p)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* consume previous data we injected */
+	if (sockmap_strp_consume_pre_data(p))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* Previously, we encountered issues such as deadlocks and
+	 * sequence errors that resulted in the inability to read
+	 * continuously. Therefore, we perform multiple iterations
+	 * of testing here.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < test_cnt; i++) {
+		sent = xsend(c, packet, pkt_size, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(sent, pkt_size, "xsend(c)"))
+			goto out_close;
+
+		recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, sizeof(rcv), MSG_DONTWAIT,
+				     IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, pkt_size, "recv_timeout(p)") ||
+		    !ASSERT_OK(memcmp(packet, rcv, pkt_size),
+				  "memcmp, data mismatch"))
+			goto out_close;
+	}
+
+	if (fionread) {
+		sent = xsend(c, packet, pkt_size, 0);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(sent, pkt_size, "second xsend(c)"))
+			goto out_close;
+
+		err = ioctl(p, FIONREAD, &avail);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "ioctl(FIONREAD) error") ||
+		    !ASSERT_EQ(avail, pkt_size, "ioctl(FIONREAD)"))
+			goto out_close;
+
+		recvd = recv_timeout(p, rcv, sizeof(rcv), MSG_DONTWAIT,
+				     IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, pkt_size, "second recv_timeout(p)") ||
+		    !ASSERT_OK(memcmp(packet, rcv, pkt_size),
+			      "second memcmp, data mismatch"))
+			goto out_close;
+	}
+
+out_close:
+	close(c);
+	close(p);
+
+out:
+	test_sockmap_strp__destroy(strp);
+}
+
+/* Test strparser with verdict mode */
+static void test_sockmap_strp_verdict(int family, int sotype)
+{
+	int zero = 0, one = 1, sent, recvd, off;
+	int err, map;
+	int c0 = -1, p0 = -1, c1 = -1, p1 = -1;
+	struct test_sockmap_strp *strp = NULL;
+	char rcv[STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN + 1] = "0";
+
+	strp = sockmap_strp_init(&map, false, true);
+	if (!ASSERT_TRUE(strp, "sockmap_strp_init"))
+		return;
+
+	/* We simulate a reverse proxy server.
+	 * When p0 receives data from c0, we forward it to c1.
+	 * From c1's perspective, it will consider this data
+	 * as being sent by p1.
+	 */
+	err = create_socket_pairs(family, sotype, &c0, &c1, &p0, &p1);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "create_socket_pairs()"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &p0, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(p0)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &one, &p1, BPF_NOEXIST);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(p1)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	sent = xsend(c0, packet, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(sent, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, "xsend(c0)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	recvd = recv_timeout(c1, rcv, sizeof(rcv), MSG_DONTWAIT,
+			     IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, "recv_timeout(c1)") ||
+	    !ASSERT_OK(memcmp(packet, rcv, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN),
+			  "received data does not match the sent data"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* send again to ensure the stream is functioning correctly. */
+	sent = xsend(c0, packet, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(sent, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, "second xsend(c0)"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* partial read */
+	off = STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN / 2;
+	recvd = recv_timeout(c1, rcv, off, MSG_DONTWAIT,
+			     IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+	recvd += recv_timeout(c1, rcv + off, sizeof(rcv) - off, MSG_DONTWAIT,
+			      IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(recvd, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN, "partial recv_timeout(c1)") ||
+	    !ASSERT_OK(memcmp(packet, rcv, STRP_PKT_FULL_LEN),
+			  "partial received data does not match the sent data"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+out_close:
+	close(c0);
+	close(c1);
+	close(p0);
+	close(p1);
+out:
+	test_sockmap_strp__destroy(strp);
+}
+
+void test_sockmap_strp(void)
+{
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp pass"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_pass(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp v6 pass"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_pass(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp pass fionread"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_pass(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, true);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp v6 pass fionread"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_pass(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, true);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp verdict"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_verdict(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp v6 verdict"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_verdict(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp partial read"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_partial_read(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp multiple packets"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_multiple_pkt(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap strp tcp dispatch"))
+		test_sockmap_strp_dispatch_pkt(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_strp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_strp.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dde3d5bec515
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_strp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
+int verdict_max_size = 10000;
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
+	__uint(max_entries, 20);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, int);
+} sock_map SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("sk_skb/stream_verdict")
+int prog_skb_verdict(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u32 one = 1;
+
+	if (skb->len > verdict_max_size)
+		return SK_PASS;
+
+	return bpf_sk_redirect_map(skb, &sock_map, one, 0);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb/stream_verdict")
+int prog_skb_verdict_pass(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return SK_PASS;
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb/stream_parser")
+int prog_skb_parser(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return skb->len;
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb/stream_parser")
+int prog_skb_parser_partial(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	/* agreement with the test program on a 4-byte size header
+	 * and 6-byte body.
+	 */
+	if (skb->len < 4) {
+		/* need more header to determine full length */
+		return 0;
+	}
+	/* return full length decoded from header.
+	 * the return value may be larger than skb->len which
+	 * means framework must wait body coming.
+	 */
+	return 10;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.43.5

Re: [PATCH bpf v9 5/5] selftests/bpf: add strparser test for bpf

[Jakub Sitnicki]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 06:09 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> Add test cases for bpf + strparser and separated them from
> sockmap_basic, as strparser has more encapsulation and parsing
> capabilities compared to standard sockmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>

Re: [PATCH bpf v9 0/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation and add tests

[Jakub Sitnicki]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 06:09 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> A previous commit described in this topic
> http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523025618.113937-9-john.fastabend@gmail.com
> directly updated 'sk->copied_seq' in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the
> action of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS,
> the update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to
> tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature.
>
> That commit works for a single stream_verdict scenario, as it also
> modified 'sk_data_ready->sk_psock_verdict_data_ready->tcp_read_skb'
> to remove updating 'sk->copied_seq'.
>
> However, for programs where both stream_parser and stream_verdict are
> active (strparser purpose), tcp_read_sock() was used instead of
> tcp_read_skb() (sk_data_ready->strp_data_ready->tcp_read_sock).
> tcp_read_sock() now still updates 'sk->copied_seq', leading to duplicated
> updates.
>
> In summary, for strparser + SK_PASS, copied_seq is redundantly calculated
> in both tcp_read_sock() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().
>
> The issue causes incorrect copied_seq calculations, which prevent
> correct data reads from the recv() interface in user-land.
>
> Also we added test cases for bpf + strparser and separated them from
> sockmap_basic, as strparser has more encapsulation and parsing
> capabilities compared to sockmap.
>
> ---
> V8 -> v9
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250121050707.55523-1-mrpre@163.com/
> Fixed some issues suggested by Jakub Sitnicki.
>
> V7 -> V8
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250116140531.108636-1-mrpre@163.com/
> Avoid using add read_sock to psock. (Jakub Sitnicki)
> Avoid using warpper function to check whether strparser is supported.
>
> V3 -> V7:
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250109094402.50838-1-mrpre@163.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241218053408.437295-1-mrpre@163.com/
> Avoid introducing new proto_ops. (Jakub Sitnicki).
> Add more edge test cases for strparser + bpf.
> Fix patchwork fail of test cases code.
> Fix psock fetch without rcu lock.
> Move code of modifying to tcp_bpf.c.
>
> V1 -> V3:
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241209152740.281125-1-mrpre@163.com/
> Fix patchwork fail by adding Fixes tag.
> Save skb data offset for ENOMEM. (John Fastabend)
> ---

Thanks for addressing all feedback, Jiayuan. Series LGTM.
Feel free to carry my tags if there is another iteration.

-jkbs

Re: [PATCH bpf v9 0/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation and add tests

[John Fastabend]

On 2025-01-26 15:16:47, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 06:09 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> > A previous commit described in this topic
> > http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523025618.113937-9-john.fastabend@gmail.com
> > directly updated 'sk->copied_seq' in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the
> > action of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS,
> > the update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to
> > tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature.
> >
> > That commit works for a single stream_verdict scenario, as it also
> > modified 'sk_data_ready->sk_psock_verdict_data_ready->tcp_read_skb'
> > to remove updating 'sk->copied_seq'.
> >
> > However, for programs where both stream_parser and stream_verdict are
> > active (strparser purpose), tcp_read_sock() was used instead of
> > tcp_read_skb() (sk_data_ready->strp_data_ready->tcp_read_sock).
> > tcp_read_sock() now still updates 'sk->copied_seq', leading to duplicated
> > updates.
> >
> > In summary, for strparser + SK_PASS, copied_seq is redundantly calculated
> > in both tcp_read_sock() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().
> >
> > The issue causes incorrect copied_seq calculations, which prevent
> > correct data reads from the recv() interface in user-land.
> >
> > Also we added test cases for bpf + strparser and separated them from
> > sockmap_basic, as strparser has more encapsulation and parsing
> > capabilities compared to sockmap.
> >
> > ---
> > V8 -> v9
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250121050707.55523-1-mrpre@163.com/
> > Fixed some issues suggested by Jakub Sitnicki.
> >
> > V7 -> V8
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250116140531.108636-1-mrpre@163.com/
> > Avoid using add read_sock to psock. (Jakub Sitnicki)
> > Avoid using warpper function to check whether strparser is supported.
> >
> > V3 -> V7:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250109094402.50838-1-mrpre@163.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241218053408.437295-1-mrpre@163.com/
> > Avoid introducing new proto_ops. (Jakub Sitnicki).
> > Add more edge test cases for strparser + bpf.
> > Fix patchwork fail of test cases code.
> > Fix psock fetch without rcu lock.
> > Move code of modifying to tcp_bpf.c.
> >
> > V1 -> V3:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241209152740.281125-1-mrpre@163.com/
> > Fix patchwork fail by adding Fixes tag.
> > Save skb data offset for ENOMEM. (John Fastabend)
> > ---
> 
> Thanks for addressing all feedback, Jiayuan. Series LGTM.
> Feel free to carry my tags if there is another iteration.

+1 Thanks Jiayuan for sticking with this.

I've reviewed this a couple times. I had one nit on the if/else branch
for a read call, but I haven't come up with anything better on my end
and this fixes a real bug. So lets take it.

For the series.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

> 
> -jkbs

Re: [PATCH bpf v9 0/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation and add tests

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:09:12 +0800 you wrote:
> A previous commit described in this topic
> http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523025618.113937-9-john.fastabend@gmail.com
> directly updated 'sk->copied_seq' in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the
> action of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS,
> the update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to
> tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf,v9,1/5] strparser: add read_sock callback
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/0532a79efd68
  - [bpf,v9,2/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/36b62df5683c
  - [bpf,v9,3/5] bpf: disable non stream socket for strparser
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/5459cce6bf49
  - [bpf,v9,4/5] selftests/bpf: fix invalid flag of recv()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/a0c11149509a
  - [bpf,v9,5/5] selftests/bpf: add strparser test for bpf
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/6fcfe96e0f6e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html