From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20795C3F2D7 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8A82073D for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="kfG0bbbf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726897AbgCEQKh (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:10:37 -0500 Received: from mail26.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.26]:58706 "EHLO mail26.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726111AbgCEQKf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:10:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1583424635; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=xa/KmK6WhNV8Qaik/yPOJqorbsfZDM0+aKqi1AIQrfk=; b=kfG0bbbfvutRCH3sYLer5Mx+9lmoCUvqzn9hT+5zJs0l51E6yzFPsvl6FIVvFvaWQBfNyDo6 71Ve5HAb82218jlR/QXRCbMgUclbSiAY3lEIbkuDlvADLped1eptvh04L+IdyzY4uOEcB7Cn cqH+QKcefbbsz1zDDN0L1C7xwpk= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.26 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJiZjI2MiIsICJuZXRkZXZAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5e61246a.7fb780057d18-smtp-out-n03; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:10:18 -0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 208C8C4479F; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5937AC43383; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 5937AC43383 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Joe Perches Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Daniel Drake , Ulrich Kunitz , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] zd1211rw/zd_usb.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member References: <20200305111216.GA24982@embeddedor> <87k13yq2jo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <256881484c5db07e47c611a56550642a6f6bd8e9.camel@perches.com> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 18:10:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <256881484c5db07e47c611a56550642a6f6bd8e9.camel@perches.com> (Joe Perches's message of "Thu, 05 Mar 2020 07:20:04 -0800") Message-ID: <87blpapyu5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Joe Perches writes: > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 16:50 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: >> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes: > [] >> > drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_usb.h | 8 ++++---- >> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> "zd1211rw: " is enough, no need to have the filename in the title. >> But I asked this already in an earlier patch, who prefers this format? >> It already got opposition so I'm not sure what to do. > > I think it doesn't matter. > > Trivial inconsistencies in patch subject and word choice > don't have much overall impact. I wrote in a confusing way, my question above was about the actual patch and not the the title. For example, Jes didn't like this style change: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11402315/ -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches