From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iwlwifi: Load firmware exclusively for Intel WiFi
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:58:12 +0300
Message-ID: <87bm8bjtjv.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
References: <20181003071513.13004-3-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
        <2787bccf20b6f647de9f4cafae5fd223e771b167.camel@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
        Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <2787bccf20b6f647de9f4cafae5fd223e771b167.camel@intel.com>
        (Luciano Coelho's message of "Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:24:44 +0300")
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> writes:

>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_INTEL)
>> +		if (firmware_unlock_func) {
>> +			firmware_unlock_func();
>> +			symbol_put(btintel_firmware_lock);
>> +			firmware_lock_func = NULL;
>> +			symbol_put(btintel_firmware_unlock);
>> +			firmware_unlock_func = NULL;
>> +		}
>> +#endif
>> +	}
>>  	else
>>  		ret = iwl_pcie_load_given_ucode(trans, fw);
>>  
>
> I'm not sure I like adding this BT-specific stuff here, especially not
> without a detailed explanation.

This looks like an ugly hack and the commit log tells nothing. This
really needs strong justifications to even consider doing something like
this.

-- 
Kalle Valo