From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ATM] he: Fix __init/__devinit conflict Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:37:41 -0700 Message-ID: <87bqp4ty4a.fsf@digitalvampire.org> References: <877j0a5i6v.fsf@digitalvampire.org> <87fyeit8wd.fsf@digitalvampire.org> <20060924.201118.71090751.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil Return-path: Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.192.81]:6649 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751452AbWIYDhn (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:37:43 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060924.201118.71090751.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:11:18 -0700 (PDT)") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David> I was waiting for a resolution in the fact that the copy David> Chas posted only had one of the transformations whereas as David> you pointed out all of the ones in your original patch were David> necessary. Actually I think there was some confusion because akpm forwarded a patch from someone else that just changed one __init -> __devinit (which appeared to fix things at least on x86_64 because of the effects of -funit-at-a-time). I'm not positive but as far as I remember Chas sent my original patch. Anyway, I think we've wasted enough time on a trivial warning patch. - R.