From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Wojtek Wasko <wwasko@nvidia.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: richardcochran@gmail.com, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, anna-maria@linutronix.de,
frederic@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] ptp: Add file permission checks on PHCs
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:24:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cyfgjp54.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250217095005.1453413-3-wwasko@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Feb 17 2025 at 11:50, Wojtek Wasko wrote:
> Many devices implement highly accurate clocks, which the kernel manages
> as PTP Hardware Clocks (PHCs). Userspace applications rely on these
> clocks to timestamp events, trace workload execution, correlate
> timescales across devices, and keep various clocks in sync.
>
> The kernel’s current implementation of PTP clocks does not enforce file
> permissions checks for most device operations except for POSIX clock
> operations, where file mode is verified in the POSIX layer before
> forwarding the call to the PTP subsystem. Consequently, it is common
> practice to not give unprivileged userspace applications any access to
> PTP clocks whatsoever by giving the PTP chardevs 600 permissions. An
> example of users running into this limitation is documented in [1].
>
> Add permission checks for functions that modify the state of a PTP
> device. Continue enforcing permission checks for POSIX clock operations
> (settime, adjtime) in the POSIX layer. One limitation remains: querying
> the adjusted frequency of a PTP device (using adjtime() with an empty
> modes field) is not supported for chardevs opened without WRITE
> permissions, as the POSIX layer mandates WRITE access for any adjtime
> operation.
That's a fixable problem, no?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-17 9:50 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] Permission checks for dynamic POSIX clocks Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-17 9:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] posix-clock: Store file pointer in struct posix_clock_context Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-17 20:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-17 9:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] ptp: Add file permission checks on PHCs Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-17 20:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-02-19 9:45 ` Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-20 12:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-20 14:07 ` Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-17 9:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] testptp: add option to open PHC in readonly mode Wojtek Wasko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cyfgjp54.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=wwasko@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).