From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Initial skb->dev and skb->protocol in ip6_output Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 21:24:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1adge1i.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> References: <1497035168-9093-1-git-send-email-chenbofeng.kernel@gmail.com> <20170609.150836.1427149901008136163.davem@davemloft.net> <3270a030-2608-1629-07d6-7fdeee9e98cc@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo@google.com, edumazet@google.com, fengc@google.com To: Chenbo Feng Return-path: Received: from canardo.mork.no ([148.122.252.1]:45215 "EHLO canardo.mork.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751561AbdFITYe (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:24:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3270a030-2608-1629-07d6-7fdeee9e98cc@gmail.com> (Chenbo Feng's message of "Fri, 9 Jun 2017 12:13:57 -0700") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Chenbo Feng writes: > This patch is still under working since it may have problem with > ip_fragment() call, did you applied it already? Should I send a revert > patch to you then? It does? I initially thought so too, but looking closer I believe the ip6_copy_metadata() calls in ip6_fragment() takes care of it. Bj=C3=B8rn