From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory CLEMENT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 3/6] net: mvneta: Remove unused code Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1sg7ds0.fsf@free-electrons.com> References: <1454332067-16378-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1454332067-16378-4-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <56AF5E55.9030603@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lior Amsalem , Nadav Haklai , Marcin Wojtas , Russell King - ARM Linux , Willy Tarreau To: Sergei Shtylyov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56AF5E55.9030603@cogentembedded.com> (Sergei Shtylyov's message of "Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:32:05 +0300") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Sergei, =20 On lun., f=C3=A9vr. 01 2016, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 2/1/2016 4:07 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > >> Since the commit 2dcf75e2793c ("net: mvneta: Associate RX queues wit= h >> each CPU") all the percpu irq are used and unmask at initialization,= so > > Unmasked, you mean? yes and disabled would be more appropriate actually. > >> there is no point to unmask them first. > > Mask, maybe (looking at the patch)? not mask, but here again disable would be more appropriate. The code removed disables the interrupt. Thanks, Gregory > >> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 8 -------- >> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/eth= ernet/marvell/mvneta.c >> index 3d6e3137f305..861b7e0d7d5f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c >> @@ -3009,14 +3009,6 @@ static int mvneta_open(struct net_device *dev= ) >> goto err_cleanup_txqs; >> } >> >> - /* Even though the documentation says that request_percpu_irq >> - * doesn't enable the interrupts automatically, it actually >> - * does so on the local CPU. >> - * >> - * Make sure it's disabled. >> - */ >> - mvneta_percpu_disable(pp); >> - >> /* Enable per-CPU interrupt on all the CPU to handle our RX >> * queue interrupts >> */ > > MBR, Sergei > --=20 Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com