From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] Remove NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL from software devices.
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 01:25:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2xh5oqi.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357543176-15352-1-git-send-email-ramirose@gmail.com> (Rami Rosen's message of "Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:19:34 +0200")
Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com> writes:
> When NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL feature is set in some network device,
> we do not allow this device to be moved from one network namespace
> to another (see dev_change_net_namespace()). Vlan device is not considered
> a local device and does not have the NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL feature. There is no
> reason that software devices like ppp and bridge will set the
> NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL feature. This patchset removes NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL
> from ppp and bridge devices.
After you saw the case for vxlan I am disappointed you respun this
patchset without asking the question: Could other devices suffer
from the same class of problem.
It didn't take me more than a few minutes of looking to see that the
bridge and the ppp network device have the same class of issue as
vxlan.
> * Changes from v1
> Do not remove NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL from vxlan devices. Moving vxlan device
> to a different namesapce does not move the state of the UDP socket related
> to this vxlan device (Following Stephen Hemminger comment).
>
> Rami Rosen (2):
> [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] ppp: remove NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL from ppp
> device features.
> [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] bridge: remove NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL from
> bridge device features.
>
> drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 1 -
> net/bridge/br_device.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 7:19 [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] Remove NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL from software devices Rami Rosen
2013-01-07 7:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] ppp: remove NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL from ppp device features Rami Rosen
2013-01-07 9:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-07 7:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] bridge: remove NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL from bridge " Rami Rosen
2013-01-07 9:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-07 9:25 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d2xh5oqi.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ramirose@gmail.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).