Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: netconsole: selftests: Change the IP subnet

[Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>]

Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> writes:

> Use a less populated IP range to run the tests, as suggested by Petr in
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87ikvukv3s.fsf@nvidia.com/.
>
> Suggested-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netcons_basic.sh | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netcons_basic.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netcons_basic.sh
> index 06021b2059b7..4ad1e216c6b0 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netcons_basic.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netcons_basic.sh
> @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ SCRIPTDIR=$(dirname "$(readlink -e "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")")
>  
>  # Simple script to test dynamic targets in netconsole
>  SRCIF="" # to be populated later
> -SRCIP=192.168.1.1
> +SRCIP=192.168.2.1

I mentioned 192.0.2.0/24, which we commonly use in selftests. The range
is meant for examples and documentation, which is not exactly selftests,
but feels like it's not bending the rules too far. And we shouldn't see
the range in the wild.

>  DSTIF="" # to be populated later
> -DSTIP=192.168.1.2
> +DSTIP=192.168.2.2
>  
>  PORT="6666"
>  MSG="netconsole selftest"