From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
Cc: <ath12k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel@quicinc.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use 128 bytes aligned iova in transmit path for WCN7850
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 18:07:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ed788enl.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240715023814.20242-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> (Baochen Qiang's message of "Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:38:14 +0800")
Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> writes:
> In transmit path, it is likely that the iova is not aligned to PCIe TLP
> max payload size, which is 128 for WCN7850. Normally in such cases hardware
> is expected to split the packet into several parts in a manner such that
> they, other than the first one, have aligned iova. However due to hardware
> limitations, WCN7850 does not behave like that properly with some specific
> unaligned iova in transmit path. This easily results in target hang in a
> KPI transmit test: packet send/receive failure, WMI command send timeout
> etc. Also fatal error seen in PCIe level:
>
> ...
> Capabilities: ...
> ...
> DevSta: ... FatalErr+ ...
> ...
> ...
>
> Work around this by manually moving/reallocating payload buffer such that
> we can map it to a 128 bytes aligned iova. The moving requires sufficient
> head room or tail room in skb: for the former we can do ourselves a favor
> by asking some extra bytes when registering with mac80211, while for the
> latter we can do nothing.
>
> Moving/reallocating buffer consumes additional CPU cycles, but the good news
> is that an aligned iova increases PCIe efficiency. In my tests on some X86
> platforms the KPI results are almost consistent.
>
> Since this is seen only with WCN7850, add a new hardware parameter to
> differentiate from others.
>
> Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
>
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
[...]
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp_tx.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,60 @@ static int ath12k_dp_prepare_htt_metadata(struct sk_buff *skb)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void ath12k_dp_tx_move_payload(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + unsigned long delta,
> + bool head)
> +{
> + unsigned long len = skb->len;
> +
> + if (head) {
> + skb_push(skb, delta);
> + memmove(skb->data, skb->data + delta, len);
> + skb_trim(skb, len);
> + } else {
> + skb_put(skb, delta);
> + memmove(skb->data + delta, skb->data, len);
> + skb_pull(skb, delta);
> + }
> +}
I'm nitpicking, but usually booleans like the head variable here don't
help with readability. Having two separate functions would be easier to
read, but this is fine as it's so small.
> @@ -279,6 +334,23 @@ int ath12k_dp_tx(struct ath12k *ar, struct ath12k_vif *arvif,
> goto fail_remove_tx_buf;
> }
>
> + if (iova_mask &&
> + (unsigned long)skb->data & iova_mask) {
> + ret = ath12k_dp_tx_align_payload(ab, &skb);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn_once(ab->dev, "failed to align TX buffer %d\n", ret);
Why dev_warn_once()? I changed it to ath12k_warn() in the pending
branch.
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hw.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,8 @@
> #define ATH12K_M3_FILE "m3.bin"
> #define ATH12K_REGDB_FILE_NAME "regdb.bin"
>
> +#define PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE 128
PCIE prefix implies that this is in PCI subsystem. I renamed it to
ATH12K_PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE.
Please check my changes:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=b603c1e0d94fb1eb0576ef48ebe37c8c1ce86328
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 2:38 [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: use 128 bytes aligned iova in transmit path for WCN7850 Baochen Qiang
2024-07-19 13:07 ` Mark Pearson
2024-08-01 15:20 ` Kalle Valo
2024-07-19 14:10 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-07-22 6:54 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-07-22 7:02 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-08-01 15:22 ` Kalle Valo
2024-08-01 15:07 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2024-08-01 18:04 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-08-05 9:36 ` Kalle Valo
2024-08-05 3:20 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-08-05 9:28 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ed788enl.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=ath12k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_bqiang@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).