From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 06/11] net: veth: Implement devtx timestamp kfuncs
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 16:29:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edm1rc4m.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230621170244.1283336-7-sdf@google.com>
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> writes:
> Have a software-based example for kfuncs to showcase how it
> can be used in the real devices and to have something to
> test against in the selftests.
>
> Both path (skb & xdp) are covered. Only the skb path is really
> tested though.
>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Not really related to this patch, but to how it would work with
different drivers/hardware.
In some of our hardware (the ones handled by igc/igb, for example), the
timestamp notification comes some time after the transmit completion
event.
From what I could gather, the idea would be for the driver to "hold" the
completion until the timestamp is ready and then signal the completion
of the frame. Is that right?
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-23 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-21 17:02 [RFC bpf-next v2 00/11] bpf: Netdev TX metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-21 17:02 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 01/11] bpf: Rename some xdp-metadata functions into dev-bound Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-21 17:02 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 02/11] bpf: Resolve single typedef when walking structs Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-22 5:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-22 17:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-21 17:02 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 04/11] bpf: Implement devtx hook points Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-21 17:02 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf: Implement devtx timestamp kfunc Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-22 12:07 ` Jesper D. Brouer
2023-06-22 17:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-21 17:02 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 06/11] net: veth: Implement devtx timestamp kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-23 23:29 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes [this message]
2023-06-26 17:00 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-26 22:00 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-26 23:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-27 1:38 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-21 17:02 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 09/11] selftests/bpf: Extend xdp_metadata with devtx kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-23 11:12 ` Jesper D. Brouer
2023-06-23 17:40 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-21 17:02 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 10/11] selftests/bpf: Extend xdp_hw_metadata " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-21 17:02 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 11/11] net/mlx5e: Support TX timestamp metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-22 19:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-22 20:13 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-22 21:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-22 22:13 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-23 2:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-23 10:16 ` Maryam Tahhan
2023-06-23 16:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-23 17:47 ` Maryam Tahhan
2023-06-23 17:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-23 18:57 ` Donald Hunter
2023-06-24 0:25 ` John Fastabend
2023-06-24 2:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-24 21:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-25 1:12 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-26 21:36 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-26 22:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-26 23:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-27 13:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-06-27 21:43 ` John Fastabend
2023-06-27 22:56 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-27 23:33 ` John Fastabend
2023-06-27 23:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-06-28 18:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-29 11:43 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-06-30 18:54 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-01 0:52 ` John Fastabend
2023-07-01 3:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-03 18:30 ` John Fastabend
2023-07-03 19:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-22 8:41 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 00/11] bpf: Netdev TX metadata Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-06-22 17:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edm1rc4m.fsf@intel.com \
--to=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).