From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: ath9k: remove unnecessary code Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 11:32:58 +0000 Message-ID: <87efvy1d07.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <20170509034814.GA18034@embeddedgus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ath9k-devel , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170509034814.GA18034@embeddedgus> (Gustavo A. R. Silva's message of "Mon, 8 May 2017 22:48:14 -0500") Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes: > The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's addres= s. > So this test will always evaluate as true. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364903 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wirele= ss/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c > index fb80ec8..5c3bc28 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ bool ath9k_hw_nvram_read(struct ath_hw *ah, u32 off, = u16 *data) > =20 > if (ah->eeprom_blob) > ret =3D ath9k_hw_nvram_read_firmware(ah->eeprom_blob, off, data); > - else if (pdata && !pdata->use_eeprom && pdata->eeprom_data) > + else if (pdata && !pdata->use_eeprom) > ret =3D ath9k_hw_nvram_read_pdata(pdata, off, data); > else > ret =3D common->bus_ops->eeprom_read(common, off, data); The patch may very well be valid (didn't check yet) but the commit log is gibberish for me. --=20 Kalle Valo=