From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56DE33644CB; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792080249; cv=none; b=N9S+6+Q52yUYPTNf7YG/D/O1pG0BtNksbOrAtJgtho4z9U5X+7b6baH8t8SghahKfGPJA0xl0PoET7Z1U//xP/TYJcYGilhon+25VMRZY85NH6MV4+UsLu9i62G89bHSeRMF1jJ+EVLhkh8UV5AD3fq5gXw0mQeIX0+0QsD6R98= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792080249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JXM+VqSUBfb1UKfsMN68G3v6uX6sD69SXf+u/Pdtfyk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Om1HRmnmTZmbYzAVlr6JBAaYcJgipFAkqXU24TpUSKPC/O4rQ0o6wBfGULrSvm93q1vrm0Uiyvsb1P0wWQgZORnrD7cxAEqDr0TSfnopMrws46+O3IUy77ST3WjEziwv7df8621TmCyaduVz+Ke8MTjlH560OXZMrhLV/FipoUs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V9KMCfUC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V9KMCfUC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AEAD1F000C4; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:03:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792080236; bh=JXM+VqSUBfb1UKfsMN68G3v6uX6sD69SXf+u/Pdtfyk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=V9KMCfUCZ6F0KoeujJEbYGuemhvcYXxbk2AfOnLo5wI0mNbzulReLYIal8HpwIAVN a5anXuey+odjFkiLbgli8Gj7rxk6MuYpOrFfTJOQXQifSJ6LXwz1Ml0mZGtFW6JK2z qJXm2B0Mj0eHUD6Lm+cSmUFpCPUVoOANlMQUZV7YzQXcWKWwek/J/EOvLFdGTUAUvu Usa2Ibs09ak2XJlCFVUwRKt2ZTq/5CmplNFjIt3EoMVd1dNE1Iar10ivfYZCa6rXs3 7xPI0AZtI1j9LmMN/bBU0LVoVIcD6ffBO1Uhr4RvjYngfOQog86DlcWpo+AjLSxsOj sknNGTUByScqg== From: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= To: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, tushar.vyavahare@intel.com, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 11/15] selftests: xsk: add a hardware mode to xskxceiver In-Reply-To: References: <20261014184539.774708-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> <20261014184539.774708-12-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> <87tsmn5mg4.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:03:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87fqy754t2.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Maciej Fijalkowski writes: >> Also, we need IPv6 support here in addition to IPv4. You can't assume >> that the DUT is onlink or IPv4. > > Is that currently a show-stopper? That is another left-over from old > architecture where data path was rather on a local and isolated > environment... /me finding excuses ;) People still run that legacy IP protocol? :-P More seriously -- my homelab, and our internal labs are v6 only...