From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC153C433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75DF619B8 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229448AbhCWLEH (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:04:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60464 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229482AbhCWLDb (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 07:03:31 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075C2C061574 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 04:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id y1so24995537ljm.10 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 04:03:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=waldekranz-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=WBxgCJhTRh1WcB80GYtxlS5QFCPAaAzzNvuI6b37OqI=; b=lC4fnoXFPSe37rwtbiqGitcathcpWNNR0fmRi8yqrF26eCPpRxsoXAw0iHHIvhXc55 ST6bPtdNRf0aAX5x5Isxe89YIX0xEK2DrAGNAnUsDCjsUB+E1qm8VB+YX67nHbnj3yaN tL4QG8bMBDxMF9h6UpDn+lWv+iXNlGAlbiP7tBhLFJk/gJJf94FyU2YfLpDpaGN5TwBT EQPlYFayqslNJtAoGzq7ydw2TLcsS1+8vp2cQhUtCgZBMhOffNT+fKjEqdazYsNvfXZo l0n/Rs0UmuLqINCZYJc9lVk5pV/6wmFTVyioYPikNfGKb4SlXZL146y6lH0kP4Fvk+a1 eBng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=WBxgCJhTRh1WcB80GYtxlS5QFCPAaAzzNvuI6b37OqI=; b=CX7xCaNcXjGwAExG/BZ3H3+RKH029k/ffgi2bqw5ouUyA0tnu//Pxj5mPIRtigs79O IUJwHPpmP29tgN0xm5LeJ7H83JHfwqhmbc5spCJdAW6iTG3QJy5pdlL8y9viYFuRISKF 2lAn3f8ueGKP1WnZ2g66QM5/QMIjSYQ+aUNCX2ZJFIvARXcbfrBY0dQzrCD7EBr1tGy6 N0d5rAR0kMQAMIsK4Rqw+RVP/hHoejzetKyjAWahlOtFfSXl+hoFF9NxzMPsyk1tiNr1 xsDpBwtKLAcmuJmxMa1NBMF4C6/8YZDKjVE1OnmdoZrdL6o7hhTyj8wVBE/lywxMZSRd ypog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bw1hVne1nqWdiyzUEQ0ExgxQknWqaqPdDNjAkTVDlx6bnuIEG z61+XS53Jg17Mo82awEa0H11TeEsuYTRJO4npZM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvIW/AJOL07/K3dKLG7AJVrZHfkW9Vvtibd4QN5bt+jpCmj7ivTHr2kYpWrWtwgprlT1Fcsg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b522:: with SMTP id z2mr2717075ljm.416.1616497407211; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 04:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wkz-x280 (static-193-12-47-89.cust.tele2.se. [193.12.47.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w14sm1810984lfl.305.2021.03.23.04.03.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 04:03:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Tobias Waldekranz To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge port flags In-Reply-To: <20210323105249.vf5nmagufqnfpyh7@skbuf> References: <20210318192540.895062-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> <87im5im9n4.fsf@waldekranz.com> <20210323105249.vf5nmagufqnfpyh7@skbuf> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:03:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87ft0mm8sh.fsf@waldekranz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:52, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:45:03AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 20:25, Tobias Waldekranz wrote: >> > Add support for offloading learning and broadcast flooding flags. With >> > this in place, mv88e6xx supports offloading of all bridge port flags >> > that are currently supported by the bridge. >> > >> > Broadcast flooding is somewhat awkward to control as there is no >> > per-port bit for this like there is for unknown unicast and unknown >> > multicast. Instead we have to update the ATU entry for the broadcast >> > address for all currently used FIDs. >> > >> > v2 -> v3: >> > - Only return a netdev from dsa_port_to_bridge_port if the port is >> > currently bridged (Vladimir & Florian) >> > >> > v1 -> v2: >> > - Ensure that mv88e6xxx_vtu_get handles VID 0 (Vladimir) >> > - Fixed off-by-one in mv88e6xxx_port_set_assoc_vector (Vladimir) >> > - Fast age all entries on port when disabling learning (Vladimir) >> > - Correctly detect bridge flags on LAG ports (Vladimir) >> > >> > Tobias Waldekranz (8): >> > net: dsa: Add helper to resolve bridge port from DSA port >> > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid useless attempts to fast-age LAGs >> > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Provide generic VTU iterator >> > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Remove some bureaucracy around querying the VTU >> > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Use standard helper for broadcast address >> > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Flood all traffic classes on standalone ports >> > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge learning flag >> > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge broadcast flooding flag >> > >> > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.c | 21 +++ >> > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.h | 2 + >> > include/net/dsa.h | 14 ++ >> > net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 14 +- >> > 5 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) >> > >> > -- >> > 2.25.1 >> >> Jakub/Dave, is anything blocking this series from going in? I am unable >> to find the series on patchwork, is that why? > > Tobias, the series went in: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=d7417ee918582504076ec1a74dfcd5fe1f55696c Ahh, that explains that. I have been looking for it in the diffstat when pulling net-next, but David pulled it in so fast that it probably flew by before I expected it :) > I'm not sure why the patchwork bot didn't go "deet-doot-dot, I am a bot" > on us. Yeah that is weird. Thanks!