From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix compile issue with disabled CONFIG_NET_NS Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:58:34 -0700 Message-ID: <87fw7m64v9.fsf@xmission.com> References: <20120816112449.GA17354@uweber-WS> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: , To: Ulrich Weber Return-path: Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:55560 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752118Ab2HPS6n (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:58:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120816112449.GA17354@uweber-WS> (Ulrich Weber's message of "Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:24:49 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ulrich Weber writes: > struct seq_net_private has no struct net > if CONFIG_NET_NS is not enabled My mistake. Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Weber Ulrich do you get any performance advantage by disabling the network namespace? I am wondering if there is any benefit to keeping it possible to disable the network namespace? The original reason for the option was so that distributions and other who wanted to avoid new code could protect their users, and that reasons seems to have long since passed. > --- > net/sctp/proc.c | 9 +++------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c > index 3e62ee5..d9cb2ab 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/proc.c > +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c > @@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ static void * sctp_eps_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos) > /* Display sctp endpoints (/proc/net/sctp/eps). */ > static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > { > - struct seq_net_private *priv = seq->private; > struct sctp_hashbucket *head; > struct sctp_ep_common *epb; > struct sctp_endpoint *ep; > @@ -216,7 +215,7 @@ static int sctp_eps_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) { > ep = sctp_ep(epb); > sk = epb->sk; > - if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), priv->net)) > + if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), seq_file_net(seq))) > continue; > seq_printf(seq, "%8pK %8pK %-3d %-3d %-4d %-5d %5d %5lu ", ep, sk, > sctp_sk(sk)->type, sk->sk_state, hash, > @@ -307,7 +306,6 @@ static void * sctp_assocs_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos) > /* Display sctp associations (/proc/net/sctp/assocs). */ > static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > { > - struct seq_net_private *priv = seq->private; > struct sctp_hashbucket *head; > struct sctp_ep_common *epb; > struct sctp_association *assoc; > @@ -324,7 +322,7 @@ static int sctp_assocs_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) { > assoc = sctp_assoc(epb); > sk = epb->sk; > - if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), priv->net)) > + if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), seq_file_net(seq))) > continue; > seq_printf(seq, > "%8pK %8pK %-3d %-3d %-2d %-4d " > @@ -423,7 +421,6 @@ static void sctp_remaddr_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > > static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > { > - struct seq_net_private *priv = seq->private; > struct sctp_hashbucket *head; > struct sctp_ep_common *epb; > struct sctp_association *assoc; > @@ -438,7 +435,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > sctp_local_bh_disable(); > read_lock(&head->lock); > sctp_for_each_hentry(epb, node, &head->chain) { > - if (!net_eq(sock_net(epb->sk), priv->net)) > + if (!net_eq(sock_net(epb->sk), seq_file_net(seq))) > continue; > assoc = sctp_assoc(epb); > list_for_each_entry(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,