From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17BD2329C74; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769764857; cv=none; b=cJNJV3n4FlghYezMakPgIvIwGxNGjjvEx7Rz8AnGgBLACNfx+kHzX0mJrARIMmDREZ4ZiQbaSaXT4Xg/Sr+yyZpWCS9281lmkldbA9PyOU+QQGjGvyBnFUhkyx6kxlmJ7k4Ibi6O6J0CUtShm42fBGCAW7opPQuxq+YSnOxRfEo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769764857; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+Ji/JDzmGzLjJdjHGDhsRLxxQQN7YO4Cx+dhNGurg1Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qNTcSUhCG3cJywsuxDC8riMLvFL5EQ0TuCzJbJiQvrZlRQc2/QHsbHijb8hq46+Q02u59xtndk3mABk3fNhee+C1e4Z/40QceVTLJUK71ZMg7UaNdqah72PVNMePwcaL7zCeQWKI4mWkExT/JSmS8J+GzwbQDvN/cl7XStZqR+E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=IYqOoMP9; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=bTc6HI6s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="IYqOoMP9"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="bTc6HI6s" From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1769764854; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TkHPyjgxMiFLjBd/qTLYzxHDhkV+NMOimWy/RgwAQQE=; b=IYqOoMP9cwdkVFqTlKdj1HG4+Kcrh6YCg4+aCc3H3ZXtJMlLF0P2JEnVrvMhaXkIbCeCK3 GvouyG2kg9ZFmyeUkrpIL+KZdD8TEz7OB9FYL4/xz9i3qt8y0iovOT3vKR4GgfeoHvtnrf JrhrjnAo9X+NmOOBpWmVwRHeTlppv2DNixL1q+LW74G+VTYGD3jqyAdd8x5PLLxxwuUcsH VzrcJTcle1zkJ2isw1BKM6tFrB2g5T0CmniMBqSGvgXusD383QJ889mAEulnWxw38qFVjx NX6pDpE4QJ/F44gZDIDnpDPDp6+5LNroN1HZBGnFEIVqHaxatFNf1neParwQdA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1769764854; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TkHPyjgxMiFLjBd/qTLYzxHDhkV+NMOimWy/RgwAQQE=; b=bTc6HI6sbzehHtCK7GRIVgY+RFo63rkBmmo0zYx7z+MKoqcrUXTl2kO+CvOu/qLng9Cair 1ph4UmjaoKutRrBw== To: Breno Leitao , pmladek@suse.com Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , pmladek@suse.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, asantostc@gmail.com, efault@gmx.de, gustavold@gmail.com, calvin@wbinvd.org, jv@jvosburgh.net, mpdesouza@suse.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/4] printk: Add execution context (task name/CPU) to printk_info In-Reply-To: References: <20260128-nbcon-v5-0-93b4ddbc181a@debian.org> <20260128-nbcon-v5-1-93b4ddbc181a@debian.org> <87ikcllrxz.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 10:26:53 +0106 Message-ID: <87h5s31moa.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On 2026-01-30, Breno Leitao wrote: >> > Suggested-by: John Ogness >> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao >> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek >> >> Reviewed-by: John Ogness > > Thank you for the review. To confirm, it is acceptable to queue this for > the next netdev version, isn't it? >From me, yes. I would be happy to see it in netdev-next and be included in the next merge window. John