netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	olteanv@gmail.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, po.liu@nxp.com, m-karicheri2@ti.com,
	Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: [next-queue RFC 0/4] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 15:06:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7wcq4nx.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518135613.379f6a63@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

Hi,

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:
>
> Please take a look at the example from the cover letter:
>
> $ ethtool $ sudo ./ethtool --show-frame-preemption
> enp3s0 Frame preemption settings for enp3s0:
> 	support: supported
> 	active: active
> 	supported queues: 0xf
> 	supported queues: 0xe
> 	minimum fragment size: 68
>
> Reading this I have no idea what 0xe is. I have to go and query TC API
> to see what priorities and queues that will be. Which IMHO is a strong
> argument that this information belongs there in the first place.

That was the (only?) strong argument in favor of having frame preemption
in the TC side when this was last discussed.

We can have a hybrid solution, we can move the express/preemptible per
queue map to mqprio/taprio/whatever. And have the more specific
configuration knobs, minimum fragment size, etc, in ethtool.

What do you think?


Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-18 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-16  1:29 [next-queue RFC 0/4] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-16  1:29 ` [next-queue RFC 1/4] ethtool: Add support for configuring " Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-19 15:27   ` Murali Karicheri
2020-05-16  1:29 ` [next-queue RFC 2/4] ethtool: Add support for configuring frame preemption via netlink Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-16  1:29 ` [next-queue RFC 3/4] igc: Add support for configuring frame preemption Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-19 16:36   ` Murali Karicheri
2020-05-16  1:29 ` [next-queue RFC 4/4] igc: Add support for exposing frame preemption stats registers Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-20 12:50   ` Murali Karicheri
2020-05-16  9:33 ` [next-queue RFC 0/4] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption Michal Kubecek
2020-05-18 19:34   ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-19 22:40     ` Andre Guedes
2020-05-19 22:53       ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-16 20:37 ` David Miller
2020-05-16 21:03   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-16 22:19     ` David Miller
2020-05-17 10:51       ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-17 18:45         ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-17 19:04           ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-18 19:05       ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-18 20:56         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-05-18 22:06           ` Vinicius Costa Gomes [this message]
2020-05-18 22:22             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-05-18 23:05               ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-18 23:09                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-05-20 21:42                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Andre Guedes
2020-05-20 22:35                     ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-19 16:34             ` Murali Karicheri
2020-05-19 17:49               ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-17 15:06 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-18 13:36   ` Murali Karicheri
2020-05-19 20:41     ` Michael Walle
2020-05-19 14:53 ` Murali Karicheri
2020-05-19 15:32   ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-19 16:11     ` Murali Karicheri
2020-05-19 22:39 ` Andre Guedes
2020-05-19 23:37   ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-05-20 12:47     ` Murali Karicheri
2020-05-20 12:52     ` Joergen Andreasen
2020-05-20 21:32       ` Vinicius Costa Gomes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h7wcq4nx.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    --cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=po.liu@nxp.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).