From: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
To: Pablo Martin Medrano <pablmart@redhat.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] selftests/net: big_tcp: return xfail on slow machines
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:42:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikovhdhy.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e35d85e-c136-f87e-a215-f2e9ccd43490@redhat.com>
Pablo Martin Medrano <pablmart@redhat.com> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Petr Machata wrote:
>
>> Due to all the &&'s peppered down there, do_test() only gets called at
>> most once, so it's OK in this case.
>
> Actually do_test() do always returns 0, so it gets called all times in the
You are right, I missed that you kept the ret == PASS test at the end of
the function. So just drop that? It's not adding anything, it could be
replaced with a : or true if you truly want to return 0. Then local
ret="PASS" can go away as well.
> code. check_err is setting RET and keeping it at the failing return
> value, so check_err is always returning error after the first error
>
> If I force the error by injecting in do_test():
>
> if [ $gw_tso = off -a $cli_tso = on ]; then
> check_err 1 "forced to fail when GW_GSO is off and CLI GSO is on"
> else
> check_err $ret_check_counter "fail on link1"
> fi
>
> The output is:
>
> Testing for BIG TCP:
> CLI GSO | GW GRO | GW GSO | SER GRO
> TEST: on on on on [ OK ]
> TEST: on off on off [ OK ]
> TEST: off on on on [ OK ]
> TEST: on on off on [FAIL]
> forced to fail when GW_GSO is off and CLI GSO is on
> TEST: off on off on [FAIL]
> forced to fail when GW_GSO is off and CLI GSO is on
> ***v4 Tests Done***
>
> So setting RET at the end of do_test is needed indeed.
The convention is to do it at the start of the test, before the first
check_err etc.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 17:07 [PATCH net v2] selftests/net: big_tcp: return xfail on slow machines Pablo Martin Medrano
2025-02-24 13:44 ` Simon Horman
2025-02-24 17:34 ` Pablo Martin Medrano
2025-02-25 10:24 ` Simon Horman
2025-02-25 12:56 ` Petr Machata
2025-02-26 17:32 ` Pablo Martin Medrano
2025-02-25 13:01 ` Petr Machata
2025-02-26 18:53 ` Pablo Martin Medrano
2025-02-27 10:42 ` Petr Machata [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ikovhdhy.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablmart@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).