From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] wireless: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:05:08 +0300 Message-ID: <87in2i2fjf.fsf@codeaurora.org> References: <20181003053902.6910-1-ldr709@gmail.com> <20181003053902.6910-9-ldr709@gmail.com> <877eizjt5j.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20181004065720.GE896@E570.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Daniel Drake , Ulrich Kunitz , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Lance Roy Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181004065720.GE896@E570.localdomain> (Lance Roy's message of "Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:57:20 -0700") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Lance Roy writes: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:06:48PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Lance Roy writes: >> >> > lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements, >> > since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is >> > also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked(). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Lance Roy >> > Cc: Daniel Drake >> > Cc: Ulrich Kunitz >> > Cc: Kalle Valo >> > Cc: "David S. Miller" >> > Cc: >> > Cc: >> > --- >> > drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_mac.c | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Should I take this or is it going through some other tree? > > Sure you can take this if you like. If not, Paul McKenney will take it in his > tree. Ok, then I'll take this to wireless-drivers-next. And I'll change the title prefix to "zd1211rw: ". -- Kalle Valo