From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov Subject: Re: [RFC] hv_netvsc: safer orderly shutdown Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:57:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87ineebg44.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> References: <20171102103531.5514-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20171108.103105.142249724388345463.davem@davemloft.net> <20171110125342.7aa7943c@shemminger-XPS-13-9360> <87k1yyjty6.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: David Miller , Stephen Hemminger , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, haiyangz@microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58964 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752429AbdKMK5p (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:57:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stephen Hemminger's message of "Sat, 11 Nov 2017 13:46:24 +0900") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Stephen Hemminger writes: > > The NAPI disable is already handled by rndis close. Sorry, but I'm probably missing something: I can only see netif_napi_del() call in netvsc_device_remove() but this happens much later. And I don see us doing napi_disable() anywhere on the path. But I'm probably missing something. -- Vitaly