From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Atzm Watanabe <atzm@stratosphere.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 v2] vxlan: Allow setting destination to unicast address.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:31:34 +0900
Message-ID: <87ip3smi15.wl%atzm@stratosphere.co.jp>
References: <87li8pmkvh.wl%atzm@stratosphere.co.jp>
	<1365702500.7355.0.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:48293 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752541Ab3DLFaz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 12 Apr 2013 01:30:55 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fb10so1272412pad.25
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1365702500.7355.0.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

At Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:48:20 +0100,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 19:17 +0900, Atzm Watanabe wrote:
> > This patch allows setting VXLAN destination to unicast address.
> > It allows that VXLAN can be used as peer-to-peer tunnel without
> > multicast.
> > 
> > v2: use a new argument "remote" instead of "group" based by
> >     Stephen Hemminger's comments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Atzm Watanabe <atzm@stratosphere.co.jp>
> [...]
> > --- a/ip/iplink_vxlan.c
> > +++ b/ip/iplink_vxlan.c
> > @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
> >  
> >  static void explain(void)
> >  {
> > -	fprintf(stderr, "Usage: ... vxlan id VNI [ group ADDR ] [ local ADDR ]\n");
> > +	fprintf(stderr, "Usage: ... vxlan id VNI [ group ADDR ] [ remote ADDR ]\n");
> [...]
> 
> Shouldn't that be "[ group|remote ADDR ]", to show that you can specify
> one or the other?

Yes, basically I agreed.
I think this should be "[ { group | remote } ADDR ]",
to accommodate the notation to others.
I'll fix this and resend the patch.

Thanks.