From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:56:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87iqyspf7v.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <47F69965.7030303@intel.com> <20080408083606.GA20863@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Kok, Auke" , Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , e1000-list , NetDev , "Allan, Bruce W" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jesse Brandeburg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Torvalds , "Ronciak, John" , Greg KH , linux-pci maillist , Arjan van de Ven , "David S. Miller" To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080408083606.GA20863@elte.hu> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:36:06 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: e1000-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: e1000-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar writes: > > ( sidenote: isnt there some facility that selects the "better" driver in > case there is an overlap between PCI IDs - with the ability for users > to override that selection? ) The default action for driver auto loaders in this case is usually to load all of them unless specially overriden. That is because there are several cases where one PCI-ID implements multiple functions served by different drivers. So far there is no really clean solution to this problem and for e1000 with PCI-E IDs it would do the wrong thing. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone