From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: drivers/net/niu.c: memcpy(dev->dev_addr, dev->perm_addr, dev->addr_len)? Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:07:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87iqzgql80.fsf@nokia.com> References: <47E2D08E.5050708@tiscali.nl> <20080320.142510.148381731.davem@davemloft.net> <47E2ECB7.5030304@tiscali.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134]:26187 "EHLO mgw-mx09.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752284AbYCUNI0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:08:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47E2ECB7.5030304@tiscali.nl> (ext Roel Kluin's message of "Fri\, 21 Mar 2008 00\:01\:11 +0100") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> writes: >> I notice you posting several of these kinds of things. > > Only 2 with the above conditions and patches or not where I was able to > figure it out myself. I don't really understand why you are opposed to > these questions. Because it will take developer's time from fixing real bugs. Time is scarce and email takes way too much of people's time already. You will understand this when you start getting too many emails. -- Kalle Valo