Re: [PATCH] net: phy: qt2025: Fix hardware revision check comment

[Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>]

Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:02:00AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 23:53:50 +0000
>> Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net> wrote:
>> 
>> > Correct the hardware revision check comment in the QT2025 driver. The
>> > revision value was documented as 0x3b instead of the correct 0xb3,
>> > which matches the actual comparison logic in the code.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs b/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
>> > index 1ab065798175b4f54c5f2fd6c871ba2942c48bf1..7e754d5d71544c6d6b6a6d90416a5a130ba76108 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
>> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ impl Driver for PhyQT2025 {
>> >  
>> >      fn probe(dev: &mut phy::Device) -> Result<()> {
>> >          // Check the hardware revision code.
>> > -        // Only 0x3b works with this driver and firmware.
>> > +        // Only 0xb3 works with this driver and firmware.
>> >          let hw_rev = dev.read(C45::new(Mmd::PMAPMD, 0xd001))?;
>> >          if (hw_rev >> 8) != 0xb3 {
>> >              return Err(code::ENODEV);
>> 
>> Oops,
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
>> 
>> Given that this patch is expected to be merged via netdev, you might
>> need to resend with a proper subject:
>> 
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
>
> Please also include a Fixes: tag.
>
> 	Andrew

Hi Andrew,

Included it, as the documentation states.

A v2 patch is up[1].

C. Mitrodimas

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250219-qt2025-comment-fix-v2-1-029f67696516@posteo.net