From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Romosan Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:57:45 -0800 Message-ID: <87k60uaxw6.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> References: <87psammchi.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> <20061214133023.0b266d8e@freekitty> <87odq6azel.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> <20061214144734.03300fa6@freekitty> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from sycorax.lbl.gov ([128.3.5.196]:3999 "EHLO sycorax.lbl.gov" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750844AbWLNW5u (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:57:50 -0500 To: Stephen Hemminger In-Reply-To: <20061214144734.03300fa6@freekitty> (message from Stephen Hemminger on Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:47:34 -0800) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger writes: > Another useful bit of information is the statistics (ethtool -S eth0). > When there were flow control bugs, they would show up as count of 1. we'll see if the machine locks up again. > Are you doing jumbo frames (MTU > 1500)? no (or at least i don't think so). how can i tell? assuming the machine doesn't lock up with msi interrupts disabled, do you want me to do anything to debug why the driver locks up when the msi interrupts are enabled? --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |