From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D00C0502F for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 19:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229655AbiH1TuM (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Aug 2022 15:50:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57174 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229507AbiH1TuL (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Aug 2022 15:50:11 -0400 Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 239562715; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 12:50:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1661716204; bh=4VVgZ7rQh5tbYoNVZ4m2rwL1L6QWOYZAwRIkB40h+lg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ud4mWVwyUceYt5Nuc1sVBj1PHwn/GWFzoIu6uvi4AnQm1tPLWwY7nly84CTBYR+nm aDKxrvGU3ZbQXJG3qKKOveLHlyInJzMhgdrtXiOHLCBQ1UbhwXv3f6eP06yvPc6bsg dCL0cbmtkl6t+XOz5R1yQ7c2CTqKXrZphpj1n/safh9eIw0GBihqSGuP3AGzoxDiC1 lFtHrsJ+RCta9ldjy01KRIgcqJ0luRdkzdL7WkmfXrfbiFgugruu3vBFr7l1MW9b16 GSavAPrWk96zebcGYyShGoB8tYNaNP2z+nxUN/kceEQI7r1HdBo3GMPdWDwycC1IM+ ZFT2tCa+8bVZg== To: Johannes Berg , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Vinicius Costa Gomes , Avi Stern , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: taprio vs. wireless/mac80211 In-Reply-To: <117aa7ded81af97c7440a9bfdcdf287de095c44f.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <117aa7ded81af97c7440a9bfdcdf287de095c44f.camel@sipsolutions.net> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 21:50:04 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87ler86tcj.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Johannes Berg writes: > Anyone have recommendations what we should do? Given that (presumably?) the use case taprio enables needs special handling all the way down to the hardware to be able to work at all on WiFi, why not just make the driver (or mac80211) expose a separate (set of) netdev queue(s) tied to that handling when prompted to do so? -Toke