From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: hawk@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us, sdf@fomichev.me,
j.koeppeler@tu-berlin.de, mfreemon@cloudflare.com,
carges@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] veth: implement Byte Queue Limits (BQL) for latency reduction
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:28:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ms05nrdw.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318134826.1281205-3-hawk@kernel.org>
hawk@kernel.org writes:
> From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
>
> Add BQL support to the veth driver to dynamically limit the number of
> bytes queued in the ptr_ring, giving the qdisc earlier feedback to shape
> traffic and reduce latency.
>
> The BQL charge (netdev_tx_sent_queue) is placed in veth_xmit() BEFORE
> veth_forward_skb() produces the SKB into the ptr_ring. This ordering is
> critical: with threaded NAPI the consumer runs on a separate CPU and can
> complete the SKB (calling dql_completed) before veth_xmit() returns. If
> the charge happened after the produce, the completion could race ahead
> of the charge, violating dql_completed()'s invariant that completed
> bytes never exceed queued bytes (BUG_ON).
>
> Whether an SKB was BQL-charged is tracked per-SKB using a VETH_BQL_FLAG
> bit in the ptr_ring pointer (BIT(1), alongside the existing VETH_XDP_FLAG
> BIT(0)). The do_bql flag from veth_xmit() propagates through
> veth_forward_skb() and veth_xdp_rx() into the ptr_ring entry. On the
> completion side in veth_xdp_rcv(), veth_ptr_is_bql() reads the flag to
> decide whether to call netdev_tx_completed_queue(). Per-SKB tracking is
> necessary because the qdisc can be replaced live (e.g. noqueue->sfq or
> vice versa via 'tc qdisc replace') while SKBs are already in-flight in
> the ptr_ring. SKBs charged under the old qdisc must complete correctly
> regardless of what qdisc is attached when the consumer runs, so each
> SKB carries its own BQL-charged state rather than re-checking the peer's
> qdisc at completion time.
It's not completely obvious to me why BQL can't be active regardless of
whether there's a qdisc installed or not? If there's no qdisc, shouldn't
BQL auto-tune to a higher value because the queue runs empty more?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-18 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 13:48 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] veth: add Byte Queue Limits (BQL) support hawk
2026-03-18 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net: add dev->bql flag to allow BQL sysfs for IFF_NO_QUEUE devices hawk
2026-03-18 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] veth: implement Byte Queue Limits (BQL) for latency reduction hawk
2026-03-18 14:28 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2026-03-18 16:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-03-19 10:04 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-03-20 14:50 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-03-23 10:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-03-18 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] veth: add tx_timeout watchdog as BQL safety net hawk
2026-03-18 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/6] net: sched: add timeout count to NETDEV WATCHDOG message hawk
2026-03-18 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/6] selftests: net: add veth BQL stress test hawk
2026-03-18 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/6] net_sched: codel: fix stale state for empty flows in fq_codel hawk
2026-03-18 14:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ms05nrdw.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=j.koeppeler@tu-berlin.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mfreemon@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox