From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Wojtek Wasko <wwasko@nvidia.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "richardcochran@gmail.com" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
"vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev" <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
"anna-maria@linutronix.de" <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
"frederic@kernel.org" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] ptp: Add file permission checks on PHCs
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:53:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msegixqr.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR12MB855850D05B3332C4DDA0D76CBEFA2@DM4PR12MB8558.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Feb 19 2025 at 09:45, Wojtek Wasko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17 2025 at 21:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > One limitation
>> > remains: querying the adjusted frequency of a PTP device (using
>> > adjtime() with an empty modes field) is not supported for chardevs
>> > opened without WRITE permissions, as the POSIX layer mandates WRITE
>> > access for any adjtime operation.
>>
>> That's a fixable problem, no?
>
> Absolutely, but to be honest I wasn't sure about how to properly change
> the access check in adjtime given it's a "generic" API. I ended up with
> something along the lines of:
>
> if (tx->modes & ~(ADJ_NANO | ADJ_MICRO))
> /* require WRITE */
>
> being that ADJ_NANO and ADJ_MICRO by themselves don't mean the clock will
> be modified. So the modes field is not really "empty" per se and the check
> becomes less self-explanatory.
ADJ_NANO and ADJ_MICRO modify the internal status. A read only operation
has to have tx->modes == 0 and the result will be served in the
NANO/MICRO representation which was set by the control application which
can write.
adjtimex(2) is clearly saying:
"The modes field determines which parameters, if any, to set."
Consequently modes != 0 requires CAP_SYS_TIME, while modes == 0 is
unpriviledged. So requiring WRITE for the FD based posix clocks is not
asked too much.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-17 9:50 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] Permission checks for dynamic POSIX clocks Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-17 9:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] posix-clock: Store file pointer in struct posix_clock_context Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-17 20:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-17 9:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] ptp: Add file permission checks on PHCs Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-17 20:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-19 9:45 ` Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-20 12:53 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-02-20 14:07 ` Wojtek Wasko
2025-02-17 9:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] testptp: add option to open PHC in readonly mode Wojtek Wasko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msegixqr.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=wwasko@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).