From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62126AD2D; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730748067; cv=none; b=WSQ0n+i2CnFBH+2WzjY5VRgYtqr2yOITXoYqEeXRNQfT1dJtoWgKXlDmKMlb5wwzM37AirQW9bGJmdPPC3FUund8L/JlEYrVzaL/vgtdb6DnkNpWReEk3YXGDNcVR9e7iY4RwykyfK+hcTGcqLo9K/zAK7KDMGUVT6bGJJQ8Ugc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730748067; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bPs8vWXRfovlBDcvuDYft3ukyZM8GmaXzcnOrYc4MEo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tPqNqvYFEMIs/dPHtJzXjfEEWjypeDfHcjppQnt41mS5bOw5uiVk06m1nIkuSshgU+hrc+2yhppj530axZtrEW+i7sb6VMjxj3RpxjMj87Bujmei26VKQkjjqgqoT6LFYB2uMTJguoc5Z0C/CpoiE+XMsWipisD2MpVXUANb9Kw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=hZFjAXBH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="hZFjAXBH" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3789142C30 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1730748063; bh=bPs8vWXRfovlBDcvuDYft3ukyZM8GmaXzcnOrYc4MEo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hZFjAXBHt2/cR2cVoaeLE5fVQsusYt7acjFaBp2QBrZVOWXQ7PakL4wXycQgxCJ/n RBnY11+mz+iBUcL15rDGmjt3awo4jKCEwiDs5gS/6i30NZ11PG/xsi2+xrcSkMnpzW y8Rij4iK8mreajiaMseUH/0Xx95O2q9SwMth/ACCEaJiPb+trk2/+n2zhof/zEWO+l syHX9y5wGojIVzXXuONFCM24bvaRW/r874q1z2dbcHYUmPAwSpBHl5hvHLiJh6H5pw 0HIvUP52DawvQXWIpmcmueyGvKrPP/9r4hSsuR0ocJIjd5ETHhECx807aVseOEWV95 v8BA8Zfi5FmNw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3789142C30; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:21:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Joe Damato Cc: Bagas Sanjaya , netdev@vger.kernel.org, hdanton@sina.com, pabeni@redhat.com, namangulati@google.com, edumazet@google.com, amritha.nambiar@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, sdf@fomichev.me, peter@typeblog.net, m2shafiei@uwaterloo.ca, bjorn@rivosinc.com, hch@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, skhawaja@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, Martin Karsten , "David S. Miller" , Simon Horman , Linux Documentation , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux BPF Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 7/7] docs: networking: Describe irq suspension In-Reply-To: References: <20241103052421.518856-1-jdamato@fastly.com> <20241103052421.518856-8-jdamato@fastly.com> <87v7x296wq.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:21:02 -0700 Message-ID: <87msie955t.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Joe Damato writes: > Thanks for the feedback. I had been preparing a v6 based on Bagas' > comments below where you snipped about in the documentation, etc. > > Should I continue to prepare a v6? It would only contain > documentation changes in this patch; I can't really tell if a v6 is > necessary or not. Look at the generated docs and be sure that results are what you expect; the enumerated-list change may be necessary. Thanks, jon