From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128CAC433FE for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237748AbiDMSgc (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:36:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230269AbiDMSgb (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:36:31 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F039F5C871; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A368B8272E; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF871C385A3; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:34:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1649874846; bh=lw5TiHWiWPe7FVeRC6rjUFCeA+yvP4jv9afjFgE3oWc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=dIT4Z/6maeZrdDbDsQ8QTlWLPC6EtFSdS1HEsCaB+lUsrupJSh6TQDTs1CdKwGmRb VS8ocCmXJ8O/+kWQu9okW7VZBMTv8vLSAOB4PrrqQUh/H579YjjHOHeENuJLHr8ez+ XxsFUlq//m7lhdAyUp02jFOSAj5k7AyiNM+XY/DrNwfUmi6h6zjK28sWEBnIMSkQJL Kz7ZcUca6qyEOKca0G1pZ2jRHh/qCe1tQ9yatE0g0bczlTqvBVwsOGc0dP3lC+MJDZ IrkKFgGzjAXHXXxA4wRP1CaXg8wYkCmvzq5K5el9UxPXLifnZpNNUmLhLFybOa6R7P laVZFLI9WnABg== Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6102129623E; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:34:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Xu Kuohai , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Zi Shen Lim , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, Shuah Khan , Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Pasha Tatashin , Peter Collingbourne , Daniel Kiss , Sudeep Holla , Steven Price , Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Delyan Kratunov Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 In-Reply-To: <20220413054959.1053668-1-xukuohai@huawei.com> References: <20220413054959.1053668-1-xukuohai@huawei.com> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:34:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87mtgorfxh.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Xu Kuohai writes: > Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as > x86. > > Tested on qemu, result: > #55 fentry_fexit:OK > #56 fentry_test:OK > #58 fexit_sleep:OK > #59 fexit_stress:OK > #60 fexit_test:OK > #67 get_func_args_test:OK > #68 get_func_ip_test:OK > #101 modify_return:OK Yay! Great to see this; thanks a bunch for tackling it! :) -Toke