netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: rl@hellgate.ch, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@gentoo.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux-Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.19+: (and quite probably earlier) VIA Rhine hanging under high network load, yet again: redux
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:29:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mw2mw3w7.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150405231510.GA15719@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> (Francois Romieu's message of "Mon, 6 Apr 2015 01:15:10 +0200")

On 6 Apr 2015, Francois Romieu outgrape:

> Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> :
> [...]
>> Gross or not, it seems to work: I've loaded it enough to crash it half a
>> dozen times, and not a crash. However, the rx_dropped stats on the link
>> aren't going up, so maybe I've just been lucky.
>
> Rx descriptors are now recycled as soon as they are processed whereas the
> driver used to perform a complete processing batch before recycling any
> descriptor. It could make a huge difference.

Ah, of course, nothing bounds rx rates :( I was stupidly thinking the
TX_RING_SIZE / TX_QUEUE_LEN gap would help us, but of course that's on
the other side. I just shouldn't read code when thick with cold, I make
really stupid thinkos... tx != rx dammit, it's not like they even share
much code in this driver, with rx being run out of napipoll and tx still
being direct...

(I'm still surprised a 64-entry RX ring can run us out of memory,
though: 64 * 1500 isn't that big, even for atomic allocations...)

> The pre-patch rx batch recycling did not include any barrier between
> rp->rx_ring[entry].addr and rp->rx_ring[entry].rx_status updates to
> enforce the ordering.

I bet that's the crucial part. At high rx rates in the pre-patch driver,
you fill up the ring and then lose that race, and disaster ensues.

> Whatever the outcome I'll have to clean my mess though.

Your mess has a) fixed the problem and b) fixed the problem *during the
easter break*. Major kudos.

      reply	other threads:[~2015-04-05 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-04 18:03 3.19+: (and quite probably earlier) VIA Rhine hanging under high network load, yet again: redux Nix
2015-04-04 21:05 ` Francois Romieu
2015-04-04 21:26   ` Nix
2015-04-05  4:01   ` David Miller
2015-04-05 20:59   ` Nix
2015-04-05 23:15     ` Francois Romieu
2015-04-05 23:29       ` Nix [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mw2mw3w7.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix \
    --to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gurligebis@gentoo.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rl@hellgate.ch \
    --cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).