netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] null pointer dereference in tcp_gso_segment()
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 01:04:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mwij4nih.fsf@natisbad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140122235651.GA20227@1wt.eu> (Willy Tarreau's message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:56:51 +0100")

Hi,

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 02:18:45PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 23:02 +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
>> > Hi Eric,
>> > 
>> > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> writes:
>> > 
>> > >> Unless there is an assumption I missed somewhere in the function, the
>> > >> problem may occur during the first round of the loop, because (unlike
>> > >> the 'while' condition does at line 21) skb->next is not checked against
>> > >> null at lines 17 above before it is passed to tcp_hdr() at line 18.
>> > >> 
>> > >> To be honest, I am asking because I am not familiar w/ the code and it
>> > >> is somewhat old so I wonder why noone got hit before. AFAICT,
>> > >> f4c50d990dcf ([NET]: Add software TSOv4) added TSOv4 support in 2006 via
>> > >> introduction of tcp_tso_segmen() (with the same kind of deref but
>> > >> possibly different assumptions) which was more recently modified via
>> > >> 28850dc7c7 (net: tcp: move GRO/GSO functions to tcp_offload) to become
>> > >> tcp_gso_segment().
>> > >> 
>> > >> David, can you confirm the analysis and possibly comment on the
>> > >> conditions needed for the bug to manifest?
>> > >
>> > > A gso packet contains at least 2 segments.
>> > 
>> > By whom / where is it enforced?
>> 
>> For example, tcp_gso_segment() does the following check :
>> 
>> if (unlikely(skb->len <= mss))
>> 	goto out;
>> 
>> If there was one segment, then skb->len should also be smaller than mss
>> 
>> Since TCP stack seemed to be the provider of the packet in your stack
>> trace, check tcp_set_skb_tso_segs()
>
> Thanks Eric for the explanation. From Arnaud's trace, I suspect that he's
> received an ACK which has released some pending data, so it's very likely
> indeed that at least two segments were released at once given that the
> receiver is likely to ACK every two segments.
>
> Also we can expect that the received ACK was copy-breaked. I don't know
> if some sort of skb recycling may happen at this stage and reveal some
> bad corner cases (eg: improperly initialized skb during the rx path that
> causes everything to break when it's recycled for the tx path), but Arnaud
> you can easily disable the rx_copybreak feature by setting the rx_copybreak
> module argument to zero. You can change it at run time in /sys/module. At
> least it will tell us if it could be related or not.

The problem is that I cannot simply use that trick to test your hypothesis
as the bug is not easily reproducible. I was lucky to trigger it twice but
never got it then (when I tested with an additonal BUG_ON(skb->next == NULL)
before the main loop in tcp_gso_segment()). 

Cheers,

a+

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-26  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-22 21:46 [BUG] null pointer dereference in tcp_gso_segment() Arnaud Ebalard
2014-01-22 21:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-22 22:02   ` Arnaud Ebalard
2014-01-22 22:18     ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-22 23:56       ` Willy Tarreau
2014-01-26  0:04         ` Arnaud Ebalard [this message]
2014-01-25 23:54       ` Arnaud Ebalard
2014-01-26  1:18         ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-27 22:14           ` Arnaud Ebalard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mwij4nih.fsf@natisbad.org \
    --to=arno@natisbad.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).