From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/sched: fq_codel: local packets no longer count against memory limit
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 14:11:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6ikygiz.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512094859.3673997-3-edumazet@google.com>
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> writes:
> Commit 95b58430abe7 ("fq_codel: add memory limitation per queue")
> claimed that the 32Mb default was "reasonable even for heavy duty usages."
>
> In practice, this is not the case.
Well, the assumption lasted a decade, so that's pretty good? :)
> Packets that are associated with local sockets sk_wmem_alloc
> do not really need additional memory control.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
> net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c b/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c
> index 1b1de693d4c64a1f5f4e9e788371829dea91740e..71107dc52be799a14f370f2ad74d2eadd93992c1 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int fq_codel_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch,
> q->new_flow_count++;
> WRITE_ONCE(flow->deficit, q->quantum);
> }
> - get_codel_cb(skb)->mem_usage = skb->truesize;
> + get_codel_cb(skb)->mem_usage = is_skb_wmem(skb) ? 0 : skb->truesize;
> q->memory_usage += get_codel_cb(skb)->mem_usage;
Only one concern here: q->memory_usage is exposed to userspace in the
stats, so this will look like the packets queued are zero-length to
anyone watching, which may end up confusing folks? Also, there will be
no way to see how many bytes are actually in the qdisc.
Should we keep a separate counter so we can still accurately report the
memory usage to userspace?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 9:48 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/sched: refine fq_codel memory limits Eric Dumazet
2026-05-12 9:48 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: make is_skb_wmem() available to modules Eric Dumazet
2026-05-12 12:06 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-05-12 9:48 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/sched: fq_codel: local packets no longer count against memory limit Eric Dumazet
2026-05-12 12:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2026-05-12 17:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-12 18:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o6ikygiz.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox