From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: arthur@arthurfabre.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org,
yan@cloudflare.com, jbrandeburg@cloudflare.com,
thoiland@redhat.com, lbiancon@redhat.com,
Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 01/20] trait: limited KV store for packet metadata
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 20:24:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6ycr6ds.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305-afabre-traits-010-rfc2-v1-1-d0ecfb869797@cloudflare.com> (arthur@arthurfabre.com's message of "Wed, 05 Mar 2025 15:31:58 +0100")
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 03:31 PM +01, arthur@arthurfabre.com wrote:
> From: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
>
> A (very limited) KV store to support storing KVs in the packet headroom,
> with:
> - 64 keys (0-63).
> - 2, 4 or 8 byte values.
> - O(1) lookup
> - O(n) insertion
> - A fixed 16 byte header.
>
> Values are stored ordered by key, immediately following the fixed
> header.
>
> This could be extended in the future, for now it implements the smallest
> possible API. The API intentionally uses u64 keys to not impose
> restrictions on the implementation in the future.
>
> I picked 2¸ 4, and 8 bytes arbitrarily. We could also support 0 sized
> values for use as flags.
> A 16 byte value could be useful to store UUIDs and IPv6 addresses.
> If we want more than 3 sizes, we can add a word to the header (for a
> total of 24 bytes) to support 7 sizes.
>
> We could also allow users to set several consecutive keys in one
> trait_set() call to support storing larger values.
>
> Implemented in the header file so functions are always inlinable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
> ---
[...]
> +/**
> + * trait_get() - Get a trait key.
> + * @traits: Start of trait store area.
> + * @key: The key to get.
> + * @val: Where to put stored value.
> + * @val_len: The length of val.
> + *
> + * Return:
> + * * %>0 - Actual size of value.
> + * * %-EINVAL - Key or length invalid.
> + * * %-ENOENT - Key has not been set with trait_set() previously.
> + * * %-ENOSPC - Val is not big enough to hold stored value.
> + */
> +static __always_inline
> +int trait_get(void *traits, u64 key, void *val, u64 val_len)
Hmm. I think that passing void *val will bite us on big endian.
Seems I can't pass an u64 * if you don't know the value size up front.
For values under 8 bytes I would end up with bytes shifted to the left.
No?
Take u64 *val instead and copy it in at the right offset?
> +{
> + if (!__trait_valid_key(key))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + struct __trait_hdr h = *(struct __trait_hdr *)traits;
> +
> + /* Check key is set */
> + if (!((h.high & (1ull << key)) || (h.low & (1ull << key))))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + /* Offset of value of this key */
> + int off = __trait_offset(h, key);
> +
> + /* Figure out our length */
> + int real_len = __trait_total_length(__trait_and(h, (1ull << key)));
> +
> + if (real_len > val_len)
> + return -ENOSPC;
> +
> + memcpy(val, traits + off, real_len);
> + return real_len;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 14:31 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 00/20] traits: Per packet metadata KV store arthur
2025-03-05 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 01/20] trait: limited KV store for packet metadata arthur
2025-03-07 6:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-07 11:14 ` Arthur Fabre
2025-03-07 17:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-10 14:45 ` Arthur Fabre
2025-03-07 19:24 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2025-03-05 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 02/20] trait: XDP support arthur
2025-03-07 19:13 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-03-10 15:50 ` Arthur Fabre
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 03/20] trait: basic XDP selftest arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 04/20] trait: basic XDP benchmark arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 05/20] trait: Replace memcpy calls with inline copies arthur
2025-03-10 10:50 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-03-10 15:52 ` Arthur Fabre
2025-03-10 22:15 ` David Laight
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 06/20] trait: Replace memmove calls with inline move arthur
2025-03-06 10:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 07/20] xdp: Track if metadata is supported in xdp_frame <> xdp_buff conversions arthur
2025-03-05 15:24 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 17:02 ` Arthur Fabre
2025-03-06 11:12 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-03-10 11:10 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 08/20] trait: Propagate presence of traits to sk_buff arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 09/20] bnxt: Propagate trait presence to skb arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 10/20] ice: " arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 11/20] veth: " arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 12/20] virtio_net: " arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 13/20] mlx5: move xdp_buff scope one level up arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 14/20] mlx5: Propagate trait presence to skb arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 15/20] xdp generic: " arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 16/20] trait: Support sk_buffs arthur
2025-03-10 11:45 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 17/20] trait: Allow socket filters to access traits arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 18/20] trait: registration API arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 19/20] trait: Sync linux/bpf.h to tools/ for trait registration arthur
2025-03-05 14:32 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 20/20] trait: register traits in benchmarks and tests arthur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o6ycr6ds.fsf@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=afabre@cloudflare.com \
--cc=arthur@arthurfabre.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jbrandeburg@cloudflare.com \
--cc=lbiancon@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thoiland@redhat.com \
--cc=yan@cloudflare.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).