From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] wcn36xx: Close SMD channel on device removal Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 15:11:38 +0300 Message-ID: <87o9uzsidh.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <20170509043637.28179-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <87h90u3672.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20170509230312.GR15143@minitux> <6e1cc217-924f-c536-6009-f6a377844d6f@broadcom.com> <20170510175254.GS15143@minitux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Arend van Spriel , Eugene Krasnikov , Eyal Ilsar , wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Andersson Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170510175254.GS15143@minitux> (Bjorn Andersson's message of "Wed, 10 May 2017 10:52:55 -0700") Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Bjorn Andersson writes: > On Wed 10 May 00:27 PDT 2017, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >> On 5/10/2017 1:03 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >> >> > AFAICT this never worked, as it seems I did the rework in SMD while we >> > tried to figure out the dependency issues we had with moving to SMD. So >> > v4.9 through v4.11 has SMD support - with this bug. >> > >> > How do I proceed, do you want me to write up a fix for stable@? Do I >> > send that out as an ordinary patch? >> >> If the patch applies cleanly on branches linux-4.9.y through linux-4.11.y in >> the stable repository you can go for '--- Option 1 ---' as described in >> /Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. >> > > It does not, before v4.12 it's a completely different function to call > to close the channel. > > But "Option 3" describes the situation, thanks for the reference. I'll > try to find the time to verify the patch on v4.11 and send it to > stable@. Great, thanks. This seems to be that serious that better to fix this also in older releases. -- Kalle Valo